Compare FanDuel with BetRivers ?

For online players, how do these 2 compare?

Yeah, save me the offshore is better sermon

Okay how about comparing FanDuel with BetMGM?

betrivers has the worst software in the industry and drastically reduces limits on anyone that wins a few bets. total joke of a sportsbook, I'm now down to CBB max of "to win" $3. total clowns

betmgm and fanduel are pretty similar, both decent software and boost options, but mgm probably the looser book. if a line move on any game they are typically 10 minutes behind. fanduel better golf options and live betting

Thank rolltide. All 3 of those places became legal here last week. I joined FanDuel and so far so good. I was wondering if BetMGm has the exact same lines as FanDuel.

Double Play Ball said:

Thank rolltide. All 3 of those places became legal here last week. I joined FanDuel and so far so good. I was wondering if BetMGm has the exact same lines as FanDuel.

Click to expand...

Can only speak with PA. Fanduels seems to use it's own set of lines. So does MGM. On the flip side Draftkings and a bunch of others use the same set of lines (Rivers, Unibet, Barstool)

Fanduel use to offer great boosts. Something happened in the last few months to change all that. They only let you bet $50 max but I used to find three team boosted parlays all the time that were 50% better than the best offshore lines. Betrivers offers a decent amount of House Specials boosts. When they were the SugarHouse they offered boosts that sometimes were 100% overlays. They would take $150 on them so you could make some decent scores. Those days have passed. Lower limits, smaller overlays but still worth a look. One time a year or so back they offered boosts that were all monster overlays on a special promotion. They won everyone of them. You would have thought they were traps but when you're beating the best closing lines by 150% on a three teamer in the long run you will crush the books. As far as regular lines like other have posted too many of the books use the same line.