The Under-Taker
Bobby,
the first night since the 7th, that you have more than one under riding tonight.
In fact with that record... I'll jump on all 4 tonight.
it was a pretty big night for the under takers record ... 2-1 with the VAN game looking great!
is this a system?
/infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif
[This message was edited by Peebs on 11-17-02 at 12:10 AM.]
the first night since the 7th, that you have more than one under riding tonight.
In fact with that record... I'll jump on all 4 tonight.
it was a pretty big night for the under takers record ... 2-1 with the VAN game looking great!
is this a system?
/infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif
[This message was edited by Peebs on 11-17-02 at 12:10 AM.]
P: no its not a system. i do my work, circle the games i like under (think i had eight yesterday) but only put on the Under-Taker page those under(s) where i can get +$05 or better. and believe me its not easy seeing some unders i love to death when they are only even money.
j: NO its not okay to bet all unders across the board. betting under 5.0 while laying more than -20 is certain loser; betting under 5.5 while laying more than -25 is certain loser. send me an email bobbybryde@aol.com and will send you some total results.
and once the hockey zone gets back up i will have in depth total chapter done.
bb
j: NO its not okay to bet all unders across the board. betting under 5.0 while laying more than -20 is certain loser; betting under 5.5 while laying more than -25 is certain loser. send me an email bobbybryde@aol.com and will send you some total results.
and once the hockey zone gets back up i will have in depth total chapter done.
bb
