I believe for the purpose of gambling, that if the game had been called with Cincy leading 6-5 in the bottom of the 7th with the Cubs still batting and with only one out that those holding a Cubs moneyline ticket would be winners. I think what they do is go with whatever the score was at then end of the last COMPLETE inning which in this case would have been 5-1 Cubs.
But since the game did go five innings, the sportsbooks would have to make a payout on moneyline tickets as long as the game wasn't tied. In this case the Reds would actually have the lead but the Cubs wouldn't have had a chance to bat in the bottom of the inning. I believe the rule is and someone who knows can correct me if i am wrong that once again they go back to the end of the last COMPLETE inning. They would treat it like the top of the 7th inning never happened since the home team didn't get a chance to answer in the bottom half of the inning.
fourtoday is 100% right
if they didn't finish the inning - and called the game - the score would go back to the last complete ining.
HOWEVER
if the cubs had trailed 6-5 going into the 6th inning - and scored 2 in B6 and before the inning had been completed the rains came and washed out the rest of the game - THEN i think the cubs would have been declared the winner - along the same lines as B9.
if they didn't finish the inning - and called the game - the score would go back to the last complete ining.
HOWEVER
if the cubs had trailed 6-5 going into the 6th inning - and scored 2 in B6 and before the inning had been completed the rains came and washed out the rest of the game - THEN i think the cubs would have been declared the winner - along the same lines as B9.
