that last play was supposed to be a 10*. . I know its easy to say after the game but hey its my monitoring and I'll do what I want.
I apologize, but I honestly doubt anyone gives a hoot. anyways, I'm going to tack on another play. .
added game: 967 Texas Rangers K Rogers -L +200 6* . .although oakland is 16-3 vs. texas when playing in oakland, they are only 7-5 vs. texas when hudson starts. texas is 6-6 vs. oakland when rodgers starts so there is basically a 50% chance shot at cashing a +200. (I dont think every game has a 50% chance if that is what you are thinking.) the loss of foulke and tejeda kind of leaves oakland on shaky ground. texas has enough good hitters they should be able to do damage if not to hudson then to a BP that seems to be shaky coming in to the R/S.
all plays are rated (1-10*'s)
added game: 967 Texas Rangers K Rogers -L +200 6* . .although oakland is 16-3 vs. texas when playing in oakland, they are only 7-5 vs. texas when hudson starts. texas is 6-6 vs. oakland when rodgers starts so there is basically a 50% chance shot at cashing a +200. (I dont think every game has a 50% chance if that is what you are thinking.) the loss of foulke and tejeda kind of leaves oakland on shaky ground. texas has enough good hitters they should be able to do damage if not to hudson then to a BP that seems to be shaky coming in to the R/S.
all plays are rated (1-10*'s)
