Attn: All Righties.

Guest · Mar 24, 2003

Do you agree with Razz's statement?

"What an idiot Joey---Sometimes I almost wish that the U.S. would take one hour--just ONE hour and take out as many civilians as possible. Just to show you "baby killer" chanting morons exactly what they have the abilty to do if they were as evil as you believe they are. Soldiers are being killed right now for no other reason than to protect as many innocents as possible."

gamblingislife · Mar 24, 2003

Lander

The guy is probably just blowing off steam after yesterday. I bet he actully cares unlike you, that american soilders met a most ignominious end to their life.

Guest · Mar 24, 2003

Don't speculate. Just a simple "Yes", "No", or "Unsure" will do.
Thanks.

gamblingislife · Mar 24, 2003

I voted "no" i don't condone that just like the majority of americans.

gamblingislife · Mar 24, 2003

Why can't i speculate you spend all your time on here speculating. Don't let the facts stand in way of your feelings.

PatPatriot · Mar 24, 2003

If I knew a nuke would end this thing to prevent 1 American soldier from getting a hangnail, i'd say go for it...The whole idea behind this action is to protect Ammerican lives.

Guest · Mar 24, 2003

What am I speculating about?
I posted Razz's comment exactly as he posted it.
I am now asking righties to confirm or deny if they agree with this statement. If I was speculating, it would imply that I wouldn't bother asking, wouldn't it?

PatPatriot · Mar 24, 2003

Gamblelife thats what libs do..speculate,contemplate,mentally masturbate its called parlysis by analysis.

Their whole world view is a paper utopia that fails miserably in reality.

Guest · Mar 24, 2003

Patriot,
I'm not asking about "nuking" Iraq, I'm asking if you agree with Razz that we should "for just ONE hour and take out as many civilians as possible."

gamblingislife · Mar 24, 2003

Lander

You've never speculated on this site. I've read quite a few of your post. And they are filled with speculation a couple of facts and alot of your misguided opinions.

PatPatriot · Mar 24, 2003

Lander, to simplify answering that question "no" would be my answer. But my guess would be Razz probably meant what was closer to my 1st answer.

Guest · Mar 24, 2003

GIS,
Unlike you I post references with the majority of my posts. I answer every question I can were as you constantly spin the topic & dodge the questions.

Speculation = GIS says the 5 Syrians were terrorists.

PatPatriot · Mar 24, 2003

Speculation would be the 5 Syrians were terrorist yes -150 no +140 would be more accurate.

Guest · Mar 24, 2003

The truth is the Americans are going to great lenghts not to kill or mistreat civilians and it's costing American lives. Seems alot of Iraqi's have a white flag and a knife to stab a US soldier when he is prepared to except the surrender.

"Walter Williams is my hero" outandup 2002

Guest · Mar 24, 2003

So far 4 out of 7 posters either support a US military attack on American civilians or are "unsure".

Very scary.

Guest · Mar 24, 2003

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by lander:
What am I speculating about?
I posted Razz's comment exactly as he posted it.
I am now asking righties to confirm or deny if they agree with this statement. If I was speculating, it would imply that I wouldn't bother asking, wouldn't it?

<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>Yeah lander this is the statement I made "exactly as I posted it" You also know that it was in response to a moronic post by one of your Frenchie friends that basically stated that since our bombs were so "smart" then the pilots must have done this on purpose. Yeah, right, I wholeheartedly support the killing of innocents...what an idiot. This is war...sht happens. For Christ sake we blew an English jet out of the sky. Must've been to get the people of England to rally around their troops so the polls would go up for Tony Blair. Their always has to be a reason for you bleeding hearts...always some kind of angle that you are reaching for. Proof...proof...gotta have proof. Unfortunately for the rest us here in reality, when you libs finally get your proof, it ususally comes in the form of 3000 dead civilians and 100+ story buildings crumbling down around your Frech-lovin asses

Guest · Mar 24, 2003

"Yeah lander this is the statement I made 'exactly as I posted it'"
"Yeah, right, I wholeheartedly support the killing of innocents..."

Hey, don't shoot the messenger.
I just copied-n-pasted your views. If they are indeed your views then you should be proud of them and defend them. Otherwise, you should be a man and admit that you posted something 'stupid', 'inhumane' and 'un-American'. We all make mistakes, so if this is indeed the case then we'll understand.

Me thinks you put your foot in your mouth.

5 out of 8 posters either support a US military attack on American civilians or are "unsure".

Guest · Mar 24, 2003

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by lander:

I just posted something 'stupid', 'inhumane' and 'un-American'. We all make mistakes
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>See how easy it is to post things out of context. By the way I agree 100%

Guest · Mar 24, 2003

Lander your hate for America is unrelenting. Shouldn't you just move to Cuba and live as a good little peasant?

"Walter Williams is my hero" outandup 2002

Guest · Mar 24, 2003

Out of context?
You wrote a complete paragraph about wanting to kill liberal Americans.

You're comparing your paragraph to a fragment of a sentance I posted? You are pathetic. Pathetic for posting that in the first place. And even more pathetic for defending it.