Betting On The War

Search
Is on-line gambling immoral? There’s no concrete answer. But one thing is certain, while America's young and brave men and women are headed off to defend our countries freedom, others will be exercising their freedom to bet.

People place bets everyday, they bet on card games, sporting events, and even which number this little ball will land on when the wheel stops.

But what about placing bets on America's pending war with Iraq? That too is now making some a lot of money. It's the latest trend in website betting. Sites like betonsports.com have gotten thousands of hits with people wagering on how long the war will last or what will become of Saddam Hussein after the war.

But is this type of gambling legal? An excerpt from gigalaw.com states: “Although the sites may be based in countries betting is legal, it's not necessarily legal for someone in the U.S. to place bets.” The house judiciary committee approved the Internet Gambling Prohibition Act in 2000. That bill would outlaw most Internet gambling with fines of $20,000 dollars and up. The bill went on to the house, but never passed.

What do the families of those sent off to protect our country from terrorism think about all of this? They say they are outraged that they are trying to make money off their son or daughter risking their life for our freedom.

Is on-line gambling immoral? There’s no concrete answer. But one thing is certain, while America's young and brave men and women are headed off to defend our countries freedom, others will be exercising their freedom to bet.


!
 
Never, never, never believe any war will be smooth

and easy, or that anyone who embarks on the strange voyage can measure

the tides and hurricanes he

will encounter. The statesman who yields to war

fever must realize that once

the signal is given, he is no longer the master

of policy but the slave of

unforeseeable and uncontrollable events."

Winston Churchill
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
434
Tokens
General,

"What do the families of those sent off to protect our country from terrorism think about all of this? They say they are outraged that they are trying to make money off their son or daughter risking their life for our freedom."

Not taking a position, just asking what the research was involving the families, and what "they" supposedly said. Also, I am wondering exactly what "they" were asked to respond to, or if maybe somebody is projecting their own views into this.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,299
Tokens
i bet the US fails horribly to garner UN support and charges to war...thus loses allied support around the globe, Bush will not be reelected because of this and US falls from being a world power.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
115
Tokens
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Bush will not be reelected because of this and US falls from being a world power.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

What a foolish statement, radioFC
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,854
Tokens
radio: a multiple-choice quiz - please identify the object and origin shown here:

7_3_132_clusterbomb_iraq.jpg


A - leftover props from the last Star Wars movie

B - a cluster-bomb with submunitions with holes drilled into them to put in chemical and biological weapons, found in Iraq as well as the manufacturing capability to make them, when they weren't supposed to even exist


Take your time
icon_smile.gif
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,854
Tokens
Forgot choice 'C' - the inside of Chirac's brain


This is now being reported at Foxnews - no article yet ... "Chirac: France Will Veto 'No Matter What'"
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
39
Tokens
who wants to take my action:i'll bet that if U.S. attacks Iraq without the approval of the U.N, it will be the start of WW3. Thanks a lot Israel
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,854
Tokens
Coasta Rica: I've got $25,000 I'll put up on that wager, assuming you clarify the conditions of the bet. I'll put the money up with a mutually agreed party.

The concept is laughable - because Britain, China and France never got UN resolutions approving their right to intervene in the Falklands, Tibet or the Ivory Coast, respectively. The real reason it's laughable is because you have mistaken the anti-American view as being rooted in some true fundamental thoughts - they're not. France, Russia, Germany and to lesser extents others all have selfish interests at stake - if they didn't, you wouldn't be hearing this hubbub.

My offer stands.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
883
Tokens
Jazz how many times do you need to be told. France is going to be losing 10 fold in tourism dollars from Americans than it would lose from a spat with Iraq. Second why is countries that don't side with the U.S. it's because of selfish interests and for the U.S. it's what humanitarian interests? I've got to admit i'm sure the French aren't too upset over less Americans visiting their country. For them it really is a win win situation.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
844
Tokens
I bet the war (without Un approval) will end quickly but anger from the war will result in numerous major terrorist attacks.

"you kill a bee but the swarm goes after you"
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
34,790
Tokens
Who will win the 2004 US Presidential Election? Odds

All wagers have action.
John Kerry
+110 Preview

George W. Bush
-150
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,625
Messages
13,453,023
Members
99,426
Latest member
bodyhealthtechofficia
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com