Actually covering 71.42% if my results 20-8 are correct. Had a breakdown per series in another thread. Outright winning near 90% at 25-3. Another bad sign, not one series, as in none could you have made money just taking points. In fact except for weak lakers and losing juice, every other series have favorite advantage. Even the dogs that cover have been very close, a point or 2 off. I have always tracked NBA post season spread results while in progress, watching best teams against ATS getting eliminated. So far 3 teams eliminated covered 2 out of 12. by two points. And this 7-1 weekend provided no relief for this dog drought. For middlers, 28 sides, 0 middles. If I was playing <A TITLE="Click for more information about poker" STYLE="text-decoration: none; border-bottom: medium solid green;" HREF="http://www.searchassistant.net/s.php?key=partypoker">poker</A> I would have walked long ago, as this market is not condusive to profits with my betting that is dog driven. Unders have kept me from dying of thirst but I require dogs to cover to make money. Key word, require. Short term I can get by. But ths 28 game sampling is turning long term, historical. Best Wishes...OF
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by FairWarning:
The question needs to be answered - How did the "sharps" bet?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Actually, the sharps helped matters a lot. The sharps bought back on the dogs big time. The books not on the Don best with totally square shops got hurt badly i was told.
The question needs to be answered - How did the "sharps" bet?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Actually, the sharps helped matters a lot. The sharps bought back on the dogs big time. The books not on the Don best with totally square shops got hurt badly i was told.
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Rio Shill:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by FairWarning:
The question needs to be answered - How did the "sharps" bet?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Actually, the sharps helped matters a lot. The sharps bought back on the dogs big time. The books not on the Don best with totally square shops got hurt badly i was told.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Thanks Rio. I figured they would get on the dogs leaving some good-sized middles.
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by FairWarning:
The question needs to be answered - How did the "sharps" bet?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Actually, the sharps helped matters a lot. The sharps bought back on the dogs big time. The books not on the Don best with totally square shops got hurt badly i was told.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Thanks Rio. I figured they would get on the dogs leaving some good-sized middles.
