We should follow my number one goal, make steady money. Lots of books have biggest lead props. This is 4 out of 5. Thought over was the squarish side but I could be a cube with that winning %. Also, they have not been squeakers but very easy winners. No back door covers, as once it hits, it wins. What do you think? Best Wishes...OF
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by OMNIVOROUS FROG:
We should follow my number one goal, make steady money. Lots of books have biggest lead props. This is 4 out of 5. Thought over was the squarish side but I could be a cube with that winning %. Also, they have not been squeakers but very easy winners. No back door covers, as once it hits, it wins. What do you think? Best Wishes...OF<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
OF: Would you go into greater detail on this ?
Perhaps some examples.
Thanks,
Doug
We should follow my number one goal, make steady money. Lots of books have biggest lead props. This is 4 out of 5. Thought over was the squarish side but I could be a cube with that winning %. Also, they have not been squeakers but very easy winners. No back door covers, as once it hits, it wins. What do you think? Best Wishes...OF<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
OF: Would you go into greater detail on this ?
Perhaps some examples.
Thanks,
Doug
Sure Doug. For example, there is a prop bet at Spiro's who many books just copy, the largest lead in the game. TWolves it was 18. So if either team leads by 19 or more, at any point of the game, you win. So far in these non competitive games, sticking with the biggest faves, 8 points or more. Pacers, Pistons, Spurs, TWolfs and Lakers, 4-1 over. Nets also went over, Kings and Heat did not. But IMO better chance of hitting blowout prop with big fave. Hope that is good enough. Best
Wishes...OF
Wishes...OF
Should have added this, once you hit, you have won, no backdoor covers, it is a final once the lead hits 19. Also, if you stuck with double digits faves, highest probability blowout games, Pistons, Spurs, TWolves and Pacers you ended up 4-0. I see this continuing first round, then it is done, once the bad teams exit. But, why not profit on these boring mismatches, and I do not lay double digits in the NBA. So, this seems like a good angle. Best Wishes...OF
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by OMNIVOROUS FROG:
Good job Rob. I take in everything, scalps, middles, bonus, you name it, I take it in. Frogs also eat everything, anything that comes near them. Put a lot of thought into that nic. Sort of fits me and what I do. Are you Funky? Best Wishes...OF<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
What is the juice on that prop?
Good job Rob. I take in everything, scalps, middles, bonus, you name it, I take it in. Frogs also eat everything, anything that comes near them. Put a lot of thought into that nic. Sort of fits me and what I do. Are you Funky? Best Wishes...OF<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
What is the juice on that prop?
Must admit, I bet a lot of props, but hard to set a line, or juice on this one as there are too many variables and unknowns. Is it funky like play that funky music white boy or funky like damn, who forgot his right guard. Plus Rob seems like a good guy but do not have any history, past performances, tendencies or current form. So guess I will do a coin flip prop, pk -.05 yes/no. Best Wishes...OF
Please excuse last post, no caffeine yet and thought prop was referring to previous post is Rob was funky, not the original thread that I started. Guess that proves I am easily distracted. Juice on those props are time and a half. 15 cents. Might try it with Spurs again tonight. They have been opening up big leads quite often. And it is like a switch, once you flip it, cash it. Best wishes...OF
OK here is my shot at this biggest lead prop. Biggest lead for Spur game over 17 -10. Seems like Spurs put on championship faces 12 games ago, and are blowing teams out, often and early. Add to that Grizz like deer in headlights. I think Grizz closed poorly, peaked just after midseason, at best level acheived ever for franchise. But with Pao not himself, and Pop's relentless defensive pressure, Grizz not scoring, at all. Outscored all 4 quarters. Think Spurs are focused for repeat, possibly improved from last year's team. Not sure Grizz can take it to the same level, sure did not see what adjustments you could make as Hubie tried all game long. Welcome to the playoffs Grizz, can I see a 18 point lead? Best Wishes...OF
