Baseball Run Lines - Betable or for Squares Only?

Search

New member
Joined
Jul 20, 2002
Messages
75,154
Tokens
Lay -1.5 plus money - take +1.5 minus money - lay -1.5 minus money on big favorites. Anyone use run lines with success?

wil.
 

Veteran
Joined
Aug 20, 2002
Messages
12,002
Tokens
I have used +1.5 run line with alot of success.

As for -1.5 run line....it depends on the situation. But NEVER use the -1.5 line on a home team.


-MC
 

Give BB 2.5k he makes it 20k within 3 months 99out
Joined
Dec 20, 2001
Messages
4,577
Tokens
Fezzik? I would love to hear you chime in on this thread.



Hitman
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2003
Messages
42,910
Tokens
I have had PHENOMENAL success betting into RUN lines with my LOCAL,

always taking the Dog...a(amazing how many dogs lose by exactly one run)...

Thing is however my LOCAL has a tendancy to juice up the FAV's meaning I can get the dogs on the RUN line at much better value than I could get on the Net...

Statistics on how many games a losing team loses by 1 RUN would be interesting...

good thread.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
467
Tokens
I could be wrong but I thought it was around 25-30%of MLB games are decided by one run.
 

Official Rx music critic and beer snob
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
25,128
Tokens
I would think teams going against a number 4 or 5 pitcher getting 1.5 would be a pretty decent play.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
150
Tokens
Last year there were 635 1-run games out of a total of 2429 games played. That is 26.14%. I don't think there is an advantage either way,
 

New member
Joined
Jul 20, 2002
Messages
75,154
Tokens
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> Last year there were 635 1-run games out of a total of 2429 games played. That is 26.14%. I don't think there is an advantage either way <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Plenty of them were won by the dog outright. In which case the plus 1.5 runs did not come into play.

wil.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2003
Messages
42,910
Tokens
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> Plenty of them were won by the dog outright. In which case the plus 1.5 runs did not come into play.

wil. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

excellent point...however how much vig do we lay to get the runs?

A better study may be to take the BOTTOM half of the league & see how often they won outright or lost by 1 run...
 

Veteran
Joined
Aug 20, 2002
Messages
12,002
Tokens
The stat you should look at is either...

1: How many times did the Underdog either Lose by just 1 run or win outright.

2: How many times did a Favorite win by at least 2.


-MC
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
1,561
Tokens
On the underdog side i do use the RL through out the season depending on the situation, not much on the fav side.
 

RX Senior
Joined
Apr 20, 2002
Messages
47,431
Tokens
yup. . .what charlie chan said and +1.5 is real good. laying -1.5 on the home team is usually never a good idea unless you have capped the absolute piss out of the game and you are sure there is no way on earth itll be close.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
150
Tokens
In those 635 one run games the -1 1/2 is a loser and the +1 1/2 is a winner regardless of who won the game, favorite or underdog.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,503
Tokens
I haven't run the numbers but I hate playing home favs -1', it always bites me in the ass when they score 1 in the bottom of the 9th for the GW.
 

New member
Joined
Jul 20, 2002
Messages
75,154
Tokens
Gagne38 - I understand that, problem is trying to identify how many times the plus 1.5 runs actually came into play. Obviously it (1.5 runs) did not matter in all 635. I hate to give up 45 or 50 cents in juice to get the extra runs, then win outright and get no plus juice.

wil.
 

RX Senior
Joined
Apr 20, 2002
Messages
47,431
Tokens
yes, plus when you lose -1.5 outright you saved juice on your loss. and when you lose +1.5 you usually lost more juice. but randyrohm said it best. it tottaly sucks ass to lay -1.5 and lose by 1 especially when you didnt get that bot of the 9th.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
150
Tokens
Well Obviously the +1 1/2 did not come into play on all 635 games(26%), so that is why I said there is no advantage either way. Even if the +1 1/2 did come into play the whole 26%, that still is not profitable and as far as laying the -1 1/2, you definitely lost all 26% of the games and that too is bad.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,225
Messages
13,449,747
Members
99,402
Latest member
jb52197
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com