Mandatory Drug Testing for All MLB Players.

Search

New member
Joined
Jul 20, 2002
Messages
75,154
Tokens
Mandatory drug testing begins Tuesday for all players on 40-man baseball rosters, in the wake of steroid indictments, not-so-whispered allegations against some of the game's stars, and reporters and fans casting skeptical eyes on downsized physiques.
Players will undergo two unannounced tests — an initial test and a follow-up five to seven days later — some time between Tuesday and the end of the regular season. Failing to take the test will count as a positive result, as will attempting to alter a specimen or using a masking agent.

Baseball's anonymous testing of 1,400 samples last season produced more than 5% of positive tests, triggering mandatory testing for at least two years or until less than 2.5% of the tests come up positive for consecutive seasons.

"After last year, having a year to get ready for a test like that, if you're in that situation, you're obviously stupid if you got caught," Colorado veteran reliever Steve Reed said. "You're even stupider if it happens this time. You deserve what you get. You can't have any more of a heads-up than you already have.

"I don't do (illegal drugs) and don't care to. But if you definitely get caught, you're not smart. Quit. It's obvious. You know the test is coming."

During the initial test, the collecting agent must tell the player to cease all nutritional supplements until after the follow-up test.

The warning is meant to prevent disputes about over-the-counter supplements causing positive results.

"I read all these criticisms, but this is an evolving policy," baseball Commissioner Bud Selig said during an interview earlier this month. "We reached an agreement with the (Major League Baseball Players Association) on this. And I think we're accomplishing more, frankly, than what people are giving us credit for and will when time goes on."

The policy has been criticized as outdated and too lenient.

The Basic Agreement lists 27 types of steroids, as well as those banned by the Food and Drug Administration, for which Major League Baseball can test. The most recent addition was THG, the "designer steroid" for which a Bay area lab is under federal investigation.

A player's test results and treatment are supposed to be confidential unless he is flagged for a second infraction, yet no one wants to be identified with the controversy.

"Even though (the testing) was anonymous last year, I don't know if you'd really want to test positive, because somebody has to know you did it if you tested positive," San Francisco pitcher Kirk Rueter said.

Although players were told the results of last year's tests would be confidential, they could become public record as part of the federal grand jury investigation.

A copy of an affidavit accidentally revealed the name of Yankees slugger Gary Sheffield, though the document did not allege Sheffield used illegal substances.

In addition, the grand jury subpoenaed the two companies, Comprehensive Drug Testing of Long Beach, Calif., and Quest Diagnostics of Teterboro, N.J., that conducted Major League Baseball's survey tests.

The issue has become more sensitive in recent weeks, with many players wanting to avoid the subject entirely.

The most prevalent fear among players and fans is that some of the game's biggest names could test positive.

Chicago White Sox slugger Frank Thomas said: "It could be bad. But as a pro athlete, you have to be held accountable, just like any Olympic athlete. They've had doping in the Olympics forever, and people have been called out at times. It's embarrassing. You have a responsibility, and you have to deal with it."


Mark Gonzales, The Arizona Republic
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,250
Tokens
Wonder if scoring will be down much with less homers.

Whats your opinion Wil?

I'm thinking they may make the balls livelier to cempensate for the expected drop off, that way MLB can say see, the homers were not due to players juicing.
 

New member
Joined
Jul 20, 2002
Messages
75,154
Tokens
Pancho - Very possible scoring may be a bit lower, it really depends on the true number of players that once used, and now (this year) do not use strength enhancing steroids. If the % is small then the effect on the game should be minimal. On the other hand, if the testing that was done missed a lot of players who used steroids, but are now forced to rely on natural strength, and talent, then we may see a dramitic decline in home runs. Messing with the ball at this point would be risky for Baseball, but not out of the question. I have to believe something like that would take a lot of time though. Should have some viable statistical information by the end of May.


wil.
 

New member
Joined
Jul 20, 2002
Messages
75,154
Tokens
You tell me.

r_giambi_tpi.jpg




Giambi is lean and mean.
First baseman Jason Giambi is noticeably leaner this spring, the result of better eating habits and hard workouts. Giambi lost four pounds during the offseason, down to 228, by cutting back on fast foods and doing extensive rehab from knee surgery. His chest, biceps and legs appear smaller -- enough so that many people did a double take when they first saw him walk through the clubhouse. "My weight is almost exactly the same," he said Feb. 23. "Just cleaning it up and losing some of that excess body fat I had." Giambi emphasized one other thing: Steroids had never been a part of his diet.


wil.
 

Another Day, Another Dollar
Joined
Mar 1, 2002
Messages
42,730
Tokens
Although not a fan of baseball, the right thing is being done here for the safety of the players and the integrity of sports.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,105
Messages
13,448,565
Members
99,393
Latest member
jaybone34
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com