<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by castaway:
Aces Gold, New Age Bets, Camelot, Alladins and a few others<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
thanks castaway. do you have an account number at any of these? i can get you a referral bonus.
Aces Gold, New Age Bets, Camelot, Alladins and a few others<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
thanks castaway. do you have an account number at any of these? i can get you a referral bonus.
i might have phrased the question wrong. what i am looking for is the opposite of a bodog or sia. bodog and sia inflate the favorite. i want a book that might lean towards inflating the other side. not to middle, i have my own reasons.
maybe it was a stupid question...maybe there are no books around like that.
maybe it was a stupid question...maybe there are no books around like that.
Blue, I have been thinking that very same thing. Most likely there are not any books that deliberatley try to make their clintele bet on underdogs as an operating model. Natrually the books that do like to gamble will have both favorites and underdogs inflated for various games depending on the information that causes the lean.
wil.
wil.
I don't think they are shading, but Canbet always seems to be the last to move a number on a favorite that is taking a lot of action at all the books. Usually if the number has gone up on a favorite your best chance of still getting it at the old number is Canbet much like when all the action is hitting the dog you can still get the last number at Bodog or SIA more often than not.
sometimes I wonder if Canbet knows what the hell they are doing
sure they have a huge square base, but some of their moves are just baffling. I remember watching that SEA/SA total all day (I think it was that one) and guess who got middled. I've also seen 2nd half lines 1.5 points off there, earlier in the season, but still, 1.5 points on a 2nd half is crazy, and it was on a public dog to boot. It seems that lately they are following pinnacle a little with some of their numbers, based on when they have a certain number compared to other similar books. I'm really worried about Royal, I dont get some of their decisions at all. Hopefully they have the peculiar action to make sense.
sure they have a huge square base, but some of their moves are just baffling. I remember watching that SEA/SA total all day (I think it was that one) and guess who got middled. I've also seen 2nd half lines 1.5 points off there, earlier in the season, but still, 1.5 points on a 2nd half is crazy, and it was on a public dog to boot. It seems that lately they are following pinnacle a little with some of their numbers, based on when they have a certain number compared to other similar books. I'm really worried about Royal, I dont get some of their decisions at all. Hopefully they have the peculiar action to make sense.
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by WildBill:
I don't think they are shading, but Canbet always seems to be the last to move a number on a favorite that is taking a lot of action at all the books. Usually if the number has gone up on a favorite your best chance of still getting it at the old number is Canbet much like when all the action is hitting the dog you can still get the last number at Bodog or SIA more often than not.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
exactly what i'm looking for...thanks
I don't think they are shading, but Canbet always seems to be the last to move a number on a favorite that is taking a lot of action at all the books. Usually if the number has gone up on a favorite your best chance of still getting it at the old number is Canbet much like when all the action is hitting the dog you can still get the last number at Bodog or SIA more often than not.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
exactly what i'm looking for...thanks
