QUESTION ABOUT WINNING %'S

Search

Rx. Senior
Joined
May 20, 2001
Messages
15,046
Tokens
Obn another site, we had a contest last week. It was to pick 5 pro football games against the spread.

2 guys finished 4-1 and i finished 3-0-2. Now they said that i was only at 80% just like the 4-1.

How is 3-0-2 a .800 winning %??? Naturally I lost the tiebreaker as well, but does anyone else think that 3-0-2 is better than 4-1?
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
77
Tokens
Normally those contest are the most wins not the guy who would have won the most money if he way laying -110. Since 4 is bigger than 3 I would have to say you lost. 4-1 is 80% and 3-0-2 is 60%.
 

Doin' the life thing...
Joined
Aug 20, 2001
Messages
3,878
Tokens
I agree with Oscar here.

3-0-2 shows three winners out of 5. That's clearly a 60%. 4-1 is 80%.

One can only count the winners, no "ifs".
 

Active member
Joined
Oct 20, 1999
Messages
75,444
Tokens
LOL!

3-0-2 is 100% and up 3 units.

4-1 is 80% and up 2.9 units.

That is my ruling.
 

Rx. Senior
Joined
May 20, 2001
Messages
15,046
Tokens
I dont care what way you look at it, 3-0-2 is NOT A a 60% winning %

Sure I only won 3 out of 5 games, but that is a bit different when ties are invloved
 

New member
Joined
Feb 4, 2003
Messages
3,271
Tokens
depends on the contest. if the person running it is not a dipshit they would have made rules to deal with this kind of situation.

Also helps if contests are run with all lines ending in a half point to avoid this crap.

IMO 3-0-2 beats 4-1, or is at least "as good as"
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,265
Messages
13,450,070
Members
99,404
Latest member
byen17188
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com