I like the format they use.
The 7% rebate is the most a player like me can get, I think. Plus its paid daily. So the goal for me is to wager 1000 through there daily break even and gather my 70 bucks. Do that 20 days a month.
I am not very current what tracks they are using but for me its fine.
The 7% rebate is the most a player like me can get, I think. Plus its paid daily. So the goal for me is to wager 1000 through there daily break even and gather my 70 bucks. Do that 20 days a month.
I am not very current what tracks they are using but for me its fine.
Man.
www.myhorseracing.com has the absolute BEST racing interface out there. 7% is fine and all I suppose if you are playing for rebates and not "winnings"
www.myhorseracing.com has the absolute BEST racing interface out there. 7% is fine and all I suppose if you are playing for rebates and not "winnings"
sds- I use to have that theory.
But 7% lets you play horses profitably. Lowering the track take out by 7% is the key.
The object I think is to wager as much as you can through the windows, if you make 1 or 2 percent on a million bucks you have beat a challenging game. However you can live off the rebate.
But 7% lets you play horses profitably. Lowering the track take out by 7% is the key.
The object I think is to wager as much as you can through the windows, if you make 1 or 2 percent on a million bucks you have beat a challenging game. However you can live off the rebate.
could someone in the forum please ask Pinnacle officially if they put the bets in the mutual pool or not? Or do they selectively do it? NEver? Id like to wager my larger exotics in a non pari mutual setting. The track take is already up to 25% on those wagers and the money in the parimutual pools just hurt your payoff even more when you win.
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by sds:
Man.
http://www.myhorseracing.com has the absolute BEST racing interface out there. 7% is fine and all I suppose if you are playing for rebates and not "winnings"
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
My nomination for the most moronic post of 2003.
A player that bets about 3K a day or 20K a week..... so lets just say 1 million a year and has a positive ROI of .05 (which is very good) therefore shows a profit of 50k for the year. Why would he want the 7% rebate and get the extra 70K to boost his profit to 120K?
This has to be a joke. Nobody can be this stupid, can they?
Man.
http://www.myhorseracing.com has the absolute BEST racing interface out there. 7% is fine and all I suppose if you are playing for rebates and not "winnings"
My nomination for the most moronic post of 2003.
A player that bets about 3K a day or 20K a week..... so lets just say 1 million a year and has a positive ROI of .05 (which is very good) therefore shows a profit of 50k for the year. Why would he want the 7% rebate and get the extra 70K to boost his profit to 120K?
This has to be a joke. Nobody can be this stupid, can they?
I use both pinnacle and www.myhorseracing.com
Out of the two i prefer myhorseracing slightly, they also have rebates ranging from 3-5% on all bets no matter what you wager. They have great software and more variety of tracks than pinnacle, but i find pinnacle easy to use, but no meadowlands is a downer.
They are both great books though.
Betehorse and Betwwts follow closely for customer service etc, they are great.
Out of the two i prefer myhorseracing slightly, they also have rebates ranging from 3-5% on all bets no matter what you wager. They have great software and more variety of tracks than pinnacle, but i find pinnacle easy to use, but no meadowlands is a downer.
They are both great books though.
Betehorse and Betwwts follow closely for customer service etc, they are great.
I will assume that ITP has a bankroll of $1M and this $70K is something that HE is really worried about LMFAO.
Inside - you have proven yourself to be a loudmouth asshole for some time now. I called you out on the board to "post up" your great wisdoms and at the very least, some plays. you have YET to do this since I arrived. In fact, all you ever do is take cheap shots at others. once again I repeat - those who have the balls to post up their plays and take ridicule from morons like ITP have my respect.
Let's just call you what you really are and leave it at that.
Are there shirts that say "Washed up Wannabee?"
Inside - you have proven yourself to be a loudmouth asshole for some time now. I called you out on the board to "post up" your great wisdoms and at the very least, some plays. you have YET to do this since I arrived. In fact, all you ever do is take cheap shots at others. once again I repeat - those who have the balls to post up their plays and take ridicule from morons like ITP have my respect.
Let's just call you what you really are and leave it at that.
Are there shirts that say "Washed up Wannabee?"
sds,
I don't think a player needs a bankroll of $1 million to be able to bet $3,000 a day.
You inferred that rebates don't mean anything compared to winning and once again (as above) I corrected you and showed that they mean more than winning.
I guess your definition of a loudmouth asshole is someone like me that tries to correct your moronic nonsense because somebody reading your posts might actually be temporarily fooled into thinking you might have more than one ounce of gambling sense.
I don't think a player needs a bankroll of $1 million to be able to bet $3,000 a day.
You inferred that rebates don't mean anything compared to winning and once again (as above) I corrected you and showed that they mean more than winning.
I guess your definition of a loudmouth asshole is someone like me that tries to correct your moronic nonsense because somebody reading your posts might actually be temporarily fooled into thinking you might have more than one ounce of gambling sense.
