SBR’s rating on Royal Sports to remain at “C” - SBR assumes because of budget reasons/legal actions

IntuitionBET · Nov 12, 2003

SBR’s rating on Royal Sports to remain at “C” 11/11/03

SBR is concerned that Royal’s recent bailout of GamblersAvenue did not include a signed contract. Without a signed, legally binding contract, GamblersAvenue may still currently belong to the original owners yet Royal is paying the players upon completion of the 5x rollover.

SBR is also concerned that Royal has grown too fast. The launch of their new low juice product 5 weeks ago and now the bailout of GamblersAvenue both came at a time when there was little promotion, we assume because of budget reasons, of Royal Sports own sportsbook.

SBR would like to see evidence that the GamblerAvenue bailout included a legally binding agreement to prevent the owners from reclaiming the sportsbook and possibly heavy damages via legal action. We believe Royal Sports is a B- or better operation even with the concerns stated above as long as the questions over the legality of the GamblersAvenue acquisition are removed.

--------------------------------------------

And roberto PLEASE answer the questions about why Interactive Entertainment is in the mix. Who are they and are they separate from CuraWorld/Royal?

And of course this is just my opinion

BallBuster · Nov 12, 2003

Any chance of giving the joker his own forum so he doesn't pollute every other thread with his agends?

truthteller · Nov 12, 2003

IB, stop your BS

IntuitionBET · Nov 12, 2003

truthteller - What B.S.? So now you are saying that SBR doesn't have this posted on their site?

www.SportsBookReview.com

Or are you saying that John from SBR is lying?

It is sooo funny how you and a small handful of others will defend roberto no matter what he does or fails to do. PATHETIC

This is a forum to keep players abreast of what is going on.

And of course this is just MY opinion

TheGeneral+ · Nov 12, 2003

Intuition BET has every right to post about news relating to a sportsbook. That's what we want to see. If anyone does not want to read his topics, they may be skipped, but the info posted here seems relevent to what is going on.

Halifax · Nov 12, 2003

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Intuition BET:
This is a forum to keep players abreast of what is going on.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Except when real "players" point out that you're a clown with an agenda - then these "players" are labelled stalkers by you, and the requisite sympathy calls to the Shrink are placed in order to try to get these "players" to stop pointing out the obvious.

If you're allowed to get away with what you do, with your never-ending attacks against an Rx advertiser, I shudder to think about what you would be able to say and do to a non-advertiser.

Intuition Debt, you're an embarrassment to yourself and the forum that houses you.

And of course this is the opinion of MANY.

RoyalSports+ · Nov 12, 2003

General,

I totally agree with you . Lets summarize what is going on :

1) Gamblers Avenue - A number of players have completed their required rollover and are cashing out real money ;
2) SBR has asked to obtain documents related to finalization of bailout before granting B- or higher ( as he states, but it is , what a coincidence, not bolded );
3) A fellow bookmaker has yet failed to provide an adeguate response to a very legitimate question in relation to an email content that Mr. Costigan has publicly posted on his website ;
4) Mr. Costigan is back to his usual smear campaign against Royal ( nothing new ) ;
5) IB has been slandering and harassing Royal/Roberto for the past 96 hours ( guess you haven't noticed );
6) IB has been repeatedly invited to come and visit the premises and check with his own eyes "what is going on" but has repeatedly declined the invitation.

Yes Pete, so much for what is going on at Royal Sports.

The Royal Sports Group

Tablarasa · Nov 12, 2003

While the material was certainly relevant, the agenda is also obvious too.

If someone else had posted the same material, but the only bold highlight was
..We believe Royal Sports is a B- or better operation even with the concerns stated above we would see IB screaming about people supporting Royal..instead, he gets to slant it his way first and deal with it.

Fishhead · Nov 12, 2003

FWIW- I consider the SBR rating of a C to be very fair.

TheGeneral+ · Nov 12, 2003

I am not getting in the middle here to deep. I do not think anyone involved is a nice christian kid.

Let me play "What would The General do?"

Assuming I am IB. I am going to stop posting anything about Royal. Everyone knows I do not like Roberto so my arguments hold little merit. If there are lawsuits then oblige by the law of the land, whatever that may be.

Assuming I am Roberto. I am going to get busy with all of the projects going. I am going to get in the trenches with the others working for my books and I am going to try and bring this book(Royal) back to the top. I am going to address any issues that come up with players in the forum and ignore any forum fight for the best interest of my book. My actions will speak loudly over my posts.

Seems so easy for me.

Good luck

Tablarasa · Nov 12, 2003

Nicely said, General.

Fishhead · Nov 12, 2003

Good recommendations by the proud Marine, The General.

Buzzsaw · Nov 12, 2003

Shouldn't be taken as positive or negative. SBR's position on Royal is unchanged.

I did not like the GA deal from a business point of view. Why wouldn't Royal register a url and have a 50% bonus themself? Why take on a bunch of bonus hunters?

But obviously that's why Roberto makes the big bucks and SBR does not.

I still don't like the fit but lay107 is showing promise and Royal is doing well. They deserve to be in the group of Jazz, V-Wager, ect., at B- imo.

Tablarasa · Nov 12, 2003

Though I have to take exception to one thing..

My mother thinks I am a nice Christian kid, and she is never wrong.

IntuitionBET · Nov 12, 2003

The General - that's what I have been waiting for a MOD to post!

Roberto and his followers have turned my posts into a mockery even when I post to support other good books like betPanAm and Betjm and I am aware of that. And will refrain from posting about him. As I am not stupid.

But as you can see he still has to get in one more little jab for his court case by stating I have harrased and SLANDERED him when All I had were some legit questions that SBR had to clarify. And it would be nice if halifax etc would cooperate as well.

You have my cooperation here at the Rx...now let's see if the roberto and his agents will stop attacking me and not my posts.

Good Luck to all and Happy Holidays

autiger · Nov 12, 2003

Royal: can you honestly(I know this is a word foreign to your vocabulary) expect a rating of higher than a C if you continue to steal money from promoters?? If an insurance company had a rating of B- or C they would be headed to bankruptcy! Hey maybe we got something here.......

SBR’s rating on Royal Sports to remain at “C” - SBR assumes because of budget reasons/legal actions

Search

IntuitionBET

New member

BallBuster

New member

truthteller

New member

IntuitionBET

New member

TheGeneral+

Another Day, Another Dollar

Halifax

New member

RoyalSports+

New member

Tablarasa

New member

Fishhead

Active member

TheGeneral+

Another Day, Another Dollar

Tablarasa

New member

Fishhead

Active member

Buzzsaw

New member

Tablarasa

New member

IntuitionBET

New member

autiger

Member

Forum statistics

Share this page