Intuition Bet: It's freaking Monday and i have no time for this. Just a question...

Intuition Bet:

Where did I say that you were involved with the Gamblers Avenue fiasco?

Please post the thread.

Thanks.

Ken and Moderators:

If you read my messages to Intuition Bet, you'll see I do not attack the poster and that I mostly refrain from the use of profanity. I have questioned his ways to "support" the shops he likes, by slandering other competitors.

I have tried to get a discussion of ideas going on with him, but he will refuse to talk like adults every time.

SHOW ME WHERE I SAY THE THINGS HE AFFIRMS I SAID. PROOF, PLEASE

Or maybe you guys expect that the affected parts by the concealed attacks and stupid insinuations of IB, remain quiet and agree. Fvck that. Now somebody, please address this shit.

[This message was edited by Walk of Life on November 10, 2003 at 01:31 PM.]

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>And now I have clevfan and Walk of Life trying to insinuate I have something to do with this Gamblers Avenue fiasco. Which is another load of crap she and her new boss are spining. She even posted some guy's personal info with his Scoial Security number last night and I don't even know who this poor guy is but you MOD let her do this crap here.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

That's your post. Where's mine insinuating anything?

Walk of Life - So if I reply to your post you will start the pissing matches that you having been trying to start lately.

Stop acting so innocent

Just one example below and I am not going to spend time finding the others. And that's NOT including all the bashing you do down the alley which I won't reply to.

http://therxforum.com/6/ubb.x?a=tpc&s=100090022&f=988094022&m=52910936&r=80010146#80010146

Here's one of the posts I am refering to at MW, so STOP acting coy and innocent:

-------------------------------------
Quote
Walk of life - posted Sunday, November 09, 2003 3:32 PM

Peep:

I agree with you 100% in that I would drop the name right off the bat. No doubt about it. But my point to be made is that Roberto bought the name, he's free to use it if he sees any advantage in it. If Roberto from Royal thinks he can turn the whole thing around and make a start from scratch, while still using the name... then "more power to him" as you would say yourself, bro.

As for the question of Royal absorbing G.A.'s debt with IB, I think that IB should square that off with the people that he initially made the deal with. Life, it seems, is not without a sense of Irony: IB has bashed BetRoyal as much as he could in many ways, fine and obvious ways too and yet, he might have an interest on Roberto honouring a debt that is not his to pay. Ironic.

I posted what I think... what do you think Peep, should Roberto assume T.A.'s debt with Intuition Bet?

Thanks TTinCO and Jackie, I'm just trying to let some info out there.
--------------------------------------------

And it doesn't matter why you posted this or how you try to defend this as it's just FALSE propaganda towards IB. So knock it off.

And BTW I never wrote anything that wasn't true about royal and EVERYONE that has worked in management there (that no longer works there for obvious reasons) including the Shrink backs it and agrees with it. And I wasn't the one that LIED that royal was NOT for sale, and I wasn't the one that LIED that royal was having a cash serious shortage from players post up accounts, which eventually caused them to get a loan/cash infusion from the Dutch which SBR confirmed....that was your friend roberto. And all of this eventually came out and he eventually had to be truthful but I'm the one that is called a liar? Grow-up is all I have to say to you and your campfire buddies ESPECAILY PEEP who was the first to post the stroy of royal's problems etc.

But that is another issue and I won't discuss that with you any longer, as you will try to, so give it up. Walk take your child pissing matches over to MW and pepe's campfire site and discuss it there as I am sure you are already


NOTE: This issue I posted in another thread was not just about you personally Mr. Walk but about posters like you that think they need to stalk and bash posters they don't like and how it scares away many lurkers from registering who don't want to sign up and will never sign up while all this anal crap goes on here. Some say something bad about a poster and posters of your ilk amplify it and pass it on as the truth without having any knowledge or access to what the truth may be.

I agree someone's anal but it's not the ones you listed in that other thread. If anyone's "scared" to post here then they're not going to contribute anything of substance anyway. This is a gambling website on the internet, not your hometown newspaper. No one knows who you are but if they do it's your own fault for letting them know. Get over it or maybe you should try another website...

www.playnicewitheachother.com

Walk of Life
Since IB did not want to directly answer your questions I will

Q)Where did I say that you were involved with the Gamblers Avenue fiasco?

A)You did'nt! According to the thread IB posted you simply were having fun with him about something totally non related to offshore business.

Walk of Life
You are clear of all charges and you are free to leave

I don't see anything that is intrinsically wrong in what I said. NOTHING. I was not bashing you and I was not attacking you. If you read what I posted you'll find my words to be true.

I'm fed up with your ignorant attitude. So, let's just be who we are. But do not expect me to remain quiet while you attack books in a concealed way, with stupid insinuations.

You'll never find one single post from me about you @ Peep's. Not one.

Intuition Bet, you don't have what it takes to discuss any matter as a gentleman.

I'm out.

BTW, the following quote:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Thanks TTinCO and Jackie, I'm just trying to let some info out there<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Was taken out of context in your post. That was an asnwer to TTinCO's and clevfan's previous posts, that had nothing to do with you.

Dicky:

This is tiresome, man. Where I come from, Intuition Bet would be treated according to his acts.

I got better things to do, but I'll stay around. If you let me, that is...

DickyW and Walk - am I missing something here?

You guys are saying that T.A. is Mike from G.A.
and you are insinuating that I am somehow involved with them and some debt.

walk wrote: "I posted what I think... what do you think Peep, should Roberto assume T.A.'s debt with Intuition Bet?

I guess you are blind and also full of it. Boy you guys never admit anything. yep I'd sure trust you with my money..NOT. LOL

Walk if you say you never posted at pepe's than I must be confusing it with the posts you make at MW.....you know after awhile all you bashers look the same.

"You guys are saying that T.A. is Mike from G.A."

What the fvck are you talking about? You lost me on this one.

"I guess you are blind and also full of it. Boy you guys never admit anything. yep I'd sure trust you with my money..NOT. LOL"

Listen fvck you want to meet me and discuss my honesty and integrety let me know when and where, you got that? I can put up with any shit you give, this is a posting forum I could care less, but you start with that crap your stepping over the line.

And for the last fvcking time....

I ACCUSED YOU OF BEING A SHILL NOTHING MORE!!! I COULD CARE LESS ABOUT ANY OTHER ISSUES OR ACCUSATIONS BEING MADE ABOUT YOU ON THIS FORUM OR ANY OTHER. DO YOU UNDERSTAND??

My first post including the name Intuition Bet @ Major's is the one you just posted. And it's the ONLY one.

To bring back some context into the topic at hand, let me remind you that Peep, other posters and I were having a discussion as of how really good would it be for Royal to keep the name Gambler's Avenue. I basically said something like:"If he wants to use it and he thinks he can revert the adverse effect, then more power to him".

Peep then asked me if I thought that Roberto should absorb Mike Silver's debts with 3rd parties, including Intuition Bet. I said:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>As for the question of Royal absorbing G.A.'s debt with IB, I think that IB should square that off with the people that he initially made the deal with<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

How am I bashing you here? If anything, I'm saying that Mike Silver would be in debt with you.

THEN, I said it'd be ironic if Roberto had to honor a bet -acquired buy somebody else- to Intuition Bet. Specially, after all the bashing Intuition bet has been doing against Royal. Do you want mr to look for all your posts and post them here, the ones that bash Royal RECENTLY?

And that was the first, only and last time I mentioned your name in one of my posts in any other forum other than the RX. I have tried to call you for a discussion here in the RX, to keep the contend levered, but you have refused every time.

***MY REAL ISSUE WITH YOU***???

1. I don't think you should slander other books just to promote the shops that you like. How do you do it? With insinuations and unspecific but targeted attacks.

2. I don't care what you post. But if you expect people to agree to what you're saying just becasue it's you, then get a life. Anybody is free to disagree with your opinion and you shouldn't roast them just because you're the almighty IB in the RX. Got it? respect others, to be respected.

Schifossa.

DickyW - First of all this thread is about walk and peep's posts NOT you. And STOP trying to stir up trouble with me as you usually do making a mockery of everything. You just should of stayed out of this thread....but it seems you can't control you anger towards me and always have to put in your 2 cents and constant ribbing. And then you say you don't care...but you can't keep yourself from making all these comments...and things like coming into this thread that has nothing to do with you.

Tell you what DickyW how about you just stay away from my threads and posts and I will stay away from yours. Pretty simple..that way you won't get riled up like you did for nothing in this thread. For the record YOU are always commenting towards me and going out of your way to get in my face and think you HAVE to police me...I don't think I am the one commenting towards you and starting sh*t. I just reply back to your B.S. and I am going to have to stop doing that as that's what you want. Bye Bye.

Walk of Life - You are one spin doctor when you want to be aren't you. Stop including me in your posts about gamblers avenue and TA which clev says is Mike from GA OK? You and peep know exactly whjat you are trying to do.So stop pretending it's innocent.

Walk wrote:***MY REAL ISSUE WITH YOU***???

1. I don't think you should slander other books just to promote the shops that you like. How do you do it? With insinuations and unspecific but targeted attacks. "

You have stated this several times. Enough is enough. BUT I think you TRY to read to many things between the lines that aren't there.

You seem to be on the defense 24/7 for royal and think I am always knocking them when I am supporting betPanAm and bat Jamaica; in fact you are OBCESSED by it.

Posters here at the Rx and else where will make their own minds up at what I or anyone psots and I they don't need you to constantly stir things up with your defense obcession. Grow up and get over it.

Walk as I said to dickyw above - Tell you what walk how about you just stay away from my threads and posts and I will stay away from yours. Pretty simple. you have made your point and we all know how you feel so please STOP policing my posts and and I will not comment on yours.

AGREED?

I may be missing something here...

but WTF does anyone's posting on MW or Peep's have to do with this place? If someone is flaming you there, take it up there. The moderators here hardly have any authority to police those places, and whining about how you are treated over there is hardly appropriate here.

WTF are you people talking about? Looks like a lot of personal BS spread over about six threads.

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Walk as I said to dickyw above - Tell you what walk how about you just stay away from my threads and posts and I will stay away from yours. Pretty simple. you have made your point and we all know how you feel so please STOP policing my posts and and I will not comment on yours.

AGREED?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Cool enough. Do as you have to and remember to ommit slanderous insinuations towards competitors of books you're promoting. Then, we'll be cool. Otherwise, we might have to do this again. Just next time, you gimme your phone number and we do this the old-fashioned way: over a conversation.

Walk get real. You stay out of my threads/posts with your little jabs and comments on MY OPINIONS and I will do the same for yours.

NO conditions and that very fair. I have a right to my opinions and you think you have a right to police me and you just stated it again above.
Your policing is the same as stalking.
You seem to read things into my posts that others and especially newbies would never see.
So this will be never ending with you.

get a job as a mod here or cut the sh*t.

If you want to act mature and be reasonable this will work...if you continue to want your above condition it won't.

The ball is in your court.