There are ways to fight the DoS attacks with hardware, software and bandwidth bursts...but it's a case-by-case situation.
Using Linux Firewalls instead of Microsoft ISA servers and ANY Microsoft product or related product makes ALL the difference.
STOP using Microsoft products for your Internet Security and these DoS attacks will just about DISSAPPEAR as these DoS attackers and Hacks only Know Microsoft and all it's flaws.
I know of several BIG companies that get DoS attacks everyday but they have NO PROBLEMS as they have studied the attacks and KNOW how to block them.
If allot of books are still having problems they need to EMPLOYEE a better Internet Security company and this will come to an end.
But it seems that some books don't want to admit they need better and more experienced Internet Security Specialists.
Here are some link to some hardware that helps but there are even better units out there:
http://www.toplayer.com/content/products/intrusion_detection/attack_mitigator.jsp
Nokia makes one of the best units out there as well
Using Linux Firewalls instead of Microsoft ISA servers and ANY Microsoft product or related product makes ALL the difference.
STOP using Microsoft products for your Internet Security and these DoS attacks will just about DISSAPPEAR as these DoS attackers and Hacks only Know Microsoft and all it's flaws.
I know of several BIG companies that get DoS attacks everyday but they have NO PROBLEMS as they have studied the attacks and KNOW how to block them.
If allot of books are still having problems they need to EMPLOYEE a better Internet Security company and this will come to an end.
But it seems that some books don't want to admit they need better and more experienced Internet Security Specialists.
Here are some link to some hardware that helps but there are even better units out there:
http://www.toplayer.com/content/products/intrusion_detection/attack_mitigator.jsp
Nokia makes one of the best units out there as well
that's the most stupid solution...
http://bulk.fefe.de/scalability/
linux sux, why yahoo.com
google.com
hotmail.com
doesnt use linux????.... FREEBSD, as a public license, then i will go for.. IRIX, HP-UX,,,
it seems you're a little kid fascinated for a silly bastard pinguin..
http://bulk.fefe.de/scalability/
linux sux, why yahoo.com
google.com
hotmail.com
doesnt use linux????.... FREEBSD, as a public license, then i will go for.. IRIX, HP-UX,,,
it seems you're a little kid fascinated for a silly bastard pinguin..
Newbie-
My take on the benchmarks is that FreeBSD isn't any better than Linux, overall. There were some tests where it did well and others where it was a clear loser.
The tester's conclusion that FreeBSD was strong among the BSD's, but that Linux 2.6 was all around great.
I think the point IB was trying to make was that Unix-flavors are better than Microsoft (which is not only inefficient but has well understood exploits).
My take on the benchmarks is that FreeBSD isn't any better than Linux, overall. There were some tests where it did well and others where it was a clear loser.
The tester's conclusion that FreeBSD was strong among the BSD's, but that Linux 2.6 was all around great.
I think the point IB was trying to make was that Unix-flavors are better than Microsoft (which is not only inefficient but has well understood exploits).
