I got a question guys. Are moneybookers related to gamebookers in any way?
'Cause if they are, how could a book afford to risk the privacy of their data base? It seems to me that if moneybookers are related to gamebookers, gamebookers would eventually have access to all the information of the players using the transaction service.
Thanks for the answers...
'Cause if they are, how could a book afford to risk the privacy of their data base? It seems to me that if moneybookers are related to gamebookers, gamebookers would eventually have access to all the information of the players using the transaction service.
Thanks for the answers...
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Walk of Life:
I got a question guys. Are _moneybookers_ related to _gamebookers_ in any way?
'Cause if they are, how could a book afford to risk the privacy of their data base? It seems to me that if moneybookers are related to gamebookers, gamebookers would eventually have access to all the information of the players using the transaction service.
Thanks for the answers...<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Both owned by the same parent company.
However, Moneybookers is under strict UK regulation, so I suspect that a privacy leak should not be a major concern.
Phaedrus can get into it in more detail.
I got a question guys. Are _moneybookers_ related to _gamebookers_ in any way?
'Cause if they are, how could a book afford to risk the privacy of their data base? It seems to me that if moneybookers are related to gamebookers, gamebookers would eventually have access to all the information of the players using the transaction service.
Thanks for the answers...<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Both owned by the same parent company.
However, Moneybookers is under strict UK regulation, so I suspect that a privacy leak should not be a major concern.
Phaedrus can get into it in more detail.
