EWINNER, bring me up to speed here:
1) The Shrink was WRONG when he said Ewinner needed 20k to “stay solvent?”
2) The Shrink was WRONG when he abruptly pulled your banner ad here at the Rx for “slow pay?” And will your banner ad be coming back up any time soon?
3) The Shrink’s “very informed source” was WRONG when he told Shrink that Ewinner was needing emergency funds to stay afloat, and these funds had to be received by Monday (yesterday)…or else???
4) Has the Shrink backtracked and or apologized on of the above 3 positions he took over the weekend?
5)Studbolt, the one responsible for creating this mess, has the Shrink decided he/they are scammers, and your position is correct in seizing his/their remaining balance?
1) The Shrink was WRONG when he said Ewinner needed 20k to “stay solvent?”
2) The Shrink was WRONG when he abruptly pulled your banner ad here at the Rx for “slow pay?” And will your banner ad be coming back up any time soon?
3) The Shrink’s “very informed source” was WRONG when he told Shrink that Ewinner was needing emergency funds to stay afloat, and these funds had to be received by Monday (yesterday)…or else???
4) Has the Shrink backtracked and or apologized on of the above 3 positions he took over the weekend?
5)Studbolt, the one responsible for creating this mess, has the Shrink decided he/they are scammers, and your position is correct in seizing his/their remaining balance?
EWINNER
Nothing against you personally, but your book is NEVER getting my business.
Shrink is the one person that will stick up for me (and other gamblers), and if you think you're going to get anywhere by dissing Shrink, you're sorely mistaken.
Answer a simple question for me:
Why would I EVER want to send in my money to you?
You're dissing Shrink. Every gambler here knows that if Shrink can't stand up to people like you, WE ARE TOAST.
It's not about how you have treated studbolt or any of the players - it's about the way you've dissed Shrink. With the attitude that you have shown, I know that if you ever take my money with a crazy rule, I have no recourse. I won't be able go to Shrink and ask for his help if you get away with this dissing. The only way we (as a group of gamblers) have ANY power is by sticking together and supporting the few people that will go to bat for us.
So, if ANYONE asks me about Ewinner - maybe 2 weeks from today, maybe 4 months from today - I will tell them that there are a lot of other books out there that are safer.
Nothing against you personally, but your book is NEVER getting my business.
Shrink is the one person that will stick up for me (and other gamblers), and if you think you're going to get anywhere by dissing Shrink, you're sorely mistaken.
Answer a simple question for me:
Why would I EVER want to send in my money to you?
You're dissing Shrink. Every gambler here knows that if Shrink can't stand up to people like you, WE ARE TOAST.
It's not about how you have treated studbolt or any of the players - it's about the way you've dissed Shrink. With the attitude that you have shown, I know that if you ever take my money with a crazy rule, I have no recourse. I won't be able go to Shrink and ask for his help if you get away with this dissing. The only way we (as a group of gamblers) have ANY power is by sticking together and supporting the few people that will go to bat for us.
So, if ANYONE asks me about Ewinner - maybe 2 weeks from today, maybe 4 months from today - I will tell them that there are a lot of other books out there that are safer.
