If you bet the yankee game at Gameday check your account

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,250
Tokens
I took the sox +1.5 on the run line at about 12:45 and got an email 10 minutes after the game started saying the event was cancelled because of the pitching change.

Now at the time I placed my bet I didn't look at the pitchers because I assumed they had the new sox pitcher and the run line was +1.5 +115, the same as every other place.

I think the bets should stand since they had the right line, they just didn't change the name of the pitcher.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
159
Tokens
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Pancho Sanza:
... at the time I placed my bet I didn't look at the pitchers because I assumed they had the new sox pitcher ...<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

icon_confused.gif
 

There's always next year, like in 75, 90-93, 99 &
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
15,270
Tokens
Not to be a dick, but would you NOT take the 1.3 seconds it take to check pitchers?

You should always, always check this.
 

Another Day, Another Dollar
Joined
Mar 1, 2002
Messages
42,730
Tokens
I think all games that have started should be graded no action. I had no score in 1st inning in all 3
icon_eek.gif
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
129
Tokens
hey pancho..why don't you tell them you want the bet to stand now that its 5-2 yanks...im sure you don't have a problem with it now...give me a break
marsububu.gif
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,854
Tokens
Pancho: glad it looks like it's working out for you - Yanks up 4-2, bases loaded in bottom of the 1st, 1 out. But you know lander's right, it's your responsibility to check the listed pitchers. I have done the same thing about 4 times, all last year, and it evened out, because I was in a hurry for reasons you'd understand - I was rushed, made the mistake and tuff shit for me, it was my fault, not the book's. I understand what you're saying about the line being the same but it really is irrelevant.

Bring back the old avatar - I miss that sick ****ing face already.
icon_smile.gif


p.s. top 2nd, Spankees lead 5-2

[This message was edited by Jazz on August 28, 2003 at 02:18 PM.]
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
560
Tokens
You should of checked the pitcher´s names. Whatever names were listed when you place the wager are the names that had to start for you to have action.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,854
Tokens
Spankees win 7-5 - it's your lucky day, Sancho, don't spend it all in one place.
icon_wink.gif


p.s. Damned if Soriano didn't single the 7th run in, bottom of the 8th, 2 outs, down in the count 1-2. And Chicago stranded a runner who was at 2nd with 1 out in the top of the ninth. It was one of those games that, if you were on the wrong side, then it would seem that life hated you.
 

New member
Joined
Jul 20, 2002
Messages
75,154
Tokens
I quess "I think the bets should stand since they had the right line, they just didn't change the name of the pitcher" is no longer your stance on the matter. Eh? Not that I blame you.


wil.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,106,969
Messages
13,439,870
Members
99,346
Latest member
tree-man
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com