WSEX YOUR CLEARED IN MY BOOK!!!!!

jjgold · Aug 24, 2003

Here is all the evidence I need and a quote from Steve.

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> Revere has been with us since December. He has only made 3 soccer bets with us. In March he bet 500 to win 2500 and then the line moved and he bet 500 to win 2250 On another occasion in March he bet 500 to win 1650 the line moved then he bet 500 to win 1500 Our soccer limits have always been 500 He knows we would not take $40,000 on one game never movithe number <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Steve give him a dime and its over. I thought this guy bet like 10 dimes on games with your place with multiple pops. He did not and he knows the limits. Sorry for bullying you a little , but I like to get answers quick.

Tough break Revere but this bet did not even come close tou your soccer bet history in the past.

Good Luck

WSEX stays in my highly touted strong book list.

EveryGamblersDream · Aug 24, 2003

Oh my god, I actually agree with JJ!!!!

jjgold · Aug 24, 2003

Good Job EGD.

Its over!!!!

Good luck to you guy

HacheMan · Aug 24, 2003

More than a grande JJ......Not enough IMO.....

jjgold · Aug 24, 2003

Hachy I come up with a grande as a figure due to I think he had one game for a dime in the past as a max bet even though limit is $500 and player knew this.

lurkerforages · Aug 24, 2003

no way.

I have a problem with the fact the facts seem to prove they cancelled the bets AFTER the event.

This looks like a book taking a shot which makes them no better than a scamming player.

They had plenty of time between the bets being placed and game time to do that.
If they were asleep at the wheel then they should eat it.

If wsex is worried about this action then they certainly come off my list of solid books.
Whats 40k?

jjgold · Aug 24, 2003

Phony e-mail killed his chances too.

LouDiamond+ · Aug 24, 2003

"This looks like a book taking a shot which makes them no better than a scamming player."

Actually it's FAR WORSE than a scamming player. A player owes no one anything. A book running a biz owes integrity to the public.

WSEX took a shot. There's no doubt about it.

Railbird · Aug 24, 2003

I wonder if the guy had a 3 cent scalp or he really liked the side alot? If it was a bet he should be paid, if it was a scalp maybe some mediation.

Railbird · Aug 24, 2003

yes I agree with Lou Diamond, no mediation pay the guy and fix the software already.

Bitterlittleman · Aug 24, 2003

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> A book running a biz owes integrity to the public. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

not 40 dimes worth.

jjgold · Aug 24, 2003

Rail (24-3) Little League

I think the bet was strange, who in the heck is betting 40 dimes on a soccer game and plus the player bets $500 a game and has only bet 3 games ever there??

Bitterlittleman · Aug 24, 2003

JJ,

I don't think his previous bet matters much. Whatever the reason was his plays were accepted. Also, it is not the line that is being disputed here.

They cancelled his wagers after the games was over.

WSEX screwed up.

I don't blame them for stickin with their story, they have to.

HacheMan · Aug 24, 2003

But JJ, everyone needs to forget about the amount wagered. $40 or $40,000, it doesn't matter. The point is........1.Nowhere in their rules do they limit soccer bets to $500 minumum.....2.The bets were accepted......3.The bets were cancelled after it was too late, if they were even cancelled at all..... Everything still weighs in the players' favor here in my opinion.....And for those who disagree or can't see the problem here, put the shoe on your foot and I bet you change your opinion!

Railbird · Aug 24, 2003

26-3 in Little leauge after Side and total this morning on the consolation game.

Bitterlittleman · Aug 24, 2003

Hache,

I agree with you, but it doesn't matter. WSEX can buy off bad publicity with less that 40k.

If the total wager was less WSEX would be paying up.

We all know that.

jjgold · Aug 24, 2003

WSEX contacted him to no avail bevcause of phony personal info!!!!!!

Players fault!!!!!!!!!!

Bitterlittleman · Aug 24, 2003

JJ,

what does that prove?

HacheMan · Aug 24, 2003

JJ, it doesnt matter if they tried (which they probably didn't!

) to contact, they still didnt cancel until the bet was over! I have a few accounts now that probably doesnt have up~to~date info, and I'm sure most of us do.

-Slim- · Aug 24, 2003

Morale of the story: If you intend on putting a $40,000 wager on a game, dont do so by placing 1439 different size wagers.......

WSEX YOUR CLEARED IN MY BOOK!!!!!

New member

Member

New member

hacheman@therx.com

New member

New member

New member

New member

The Great Govenor of California

The Great Govenor of California

New member

New member

New member

hacheman@therx.com

The Great Govenor of California

New member

New member

New member

hacheman@therx.com

New member

Forum statistics

Share this page