Bonds MVP

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
805
Tokens
Bonds just hit his 8th career walk off homer...Welcome Back!

Has to be MVP...we saw what happened without him in lineup.

wiz
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,781
Tokens
Its hard to imagine a guy more valuable to a team. I mean Pujols is a great guy, great numbers, but without him the Cards can still get it done. I wouldn't put walkoff homers as high in importance, but just the way he is like this Mt. Everest everytime through the lineup, two or even three hitters ahead the manager and catcher are already thinking of what they want to do. No one has done that in decades and even when his age says he should be declining he still has that power. Barry is still the MVP.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
329
Tokens
Has there ever been co-MVP's for the baseball season? Maybe Barry and Albert pujols can be the first.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,624
Tokens
without a doubt bonds is the nl mvp.
the guy maybe gets 1 pitch to hit during a game. Bonds is unreal.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
520
Tokens
Barry Bonds is a modern day Babe Ruth. He is unbelievable. He is being paid $15,000,000 this season and proves his worth each and every time he is in the lineup. He is without question indispensable to his team. But at this point he and Pujols are deadlocked for my MVP vote.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
279
Tokens
Don't EVER put that steroid freak in the same sentence as the babe!! NO COMPARISON
1041579183.gif
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,584
Tokens
Well, if people really think Bonds will be the MVP they should bet him. Compared to Pujols he is of good value Pujols -250, Bonds +150. I really don;t know who it will be.
 

New member
Joined
Jul 20, 2002
Messages
10,363
Tokens
Bonds is a lock

Pujols plays for a losing team, no comparison
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,597
Tokens
I don't even like Bonds much but he should be MVP and the fact of the matter is he should have one 2 other times and did not.

I played baseball all of my life and the things this man does are unbelievable. He rarely gets a strike, time after time going to the plate and not getting strikes makes it extremely difficult to hit with consistency and this guy can get walked 3 times in a game and still has the "moxy" on the final trip to the plate when they can't walk him and deliver. Another way of looking at it is this, without Bonds the Giants would be out of the pennant race, with him they are 8 games up. Nobody and I mean nobody influences the outcome of a game like Barry Bonds, period!
 

New member
Joined
Jul 20, 2002
Messages
10,363
Tokens
Greatest player ever, not even a close second!!!

And I am not a Bonds fan.

Never saw a player that you should actually walk 4 times a game , he is that good.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,250
Tokens
I never thought I would say it given that I feel athletes are way overpaid but he is worth every penny they pay him.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,624
Tokens
Agreed, without Bonds, the giants would be lucky to be in 3rd place behind Az and LA.
I was thinking of taking Bonds +150 to win the MVP, but we all know that the media doesn't like him. If they can vote for Pendleton over Bonds, they can surely vote for Puljos over Bonds.
But, I expect the Giants to be in the playoffs
and STL to be home. That should give the nod
to Bonds.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
801
Tokens
If the media doesn't start picking Bonds as the NL MVP more then people will start hating the media. Wait they already do! Now I'm confused
icon_eek.gif
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
694
Tokens
The only argument you could possibly make against Bonds is the difference in games played. But even that's somewhat flawed.

Others can do a far more precise analysis of this, I'm sure, but here's what happened when I played around a little.

Bonds has played 103 games, averaging 4.20 PA/G
He's missed 21 games, so that would be 88 PA.

Bonds has a 1.269 OPS. (OBP+Slug.%)
Pujols has a 1.128 OPS.

Now, if we add in 88 PA to Bonds' total (the PA that have gone to other players in Bonds' absense) those 88 PA have to be at .433 OPS to reduce Bonds' "modified" OPS to below Pujols' total.

That is, Bonds' 433 PA @ 1.269 OPS + 88 PA @ .433 OPS = 1.127 OPS.

Marvin Bernard has gotten much of the PT when Bonds doesn't play. Bernard has been bad, as evidenced by his .488 OPS. Ruben Rivera's has been .595.

So, as bad as Bonds' replacements have been, Bonds + Replacements look like they still are hitting better than Pujols. And that doesn't even consider the difference in their home fields, or the offensive players around them.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
520
Tokens
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by benstern:
Don't EVER put that steroid freak in the same sentence as the babe!! NO COMPARISON
1041579183.gif
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

OK benstern, I will comply with your request.
Barry Lamar Bonds is the greatest home run hitter of all time.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,633
Messages
13,453,115
Members
99,426
Latest member
bodyhealthtechofficia
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com