Royal smear campaign, the definition of irresponsibility

Sodium Pentethol V · Jul 27, 2003

That the proprietors of this site persist in questioning the solvency of Royal Sports three weeks before football season.

There's always room for a first, but a place going out of business, with football right around the corner would defy all likelihood. That's what gamblers deal in, what's the probability of it happening.

To consider anyone that thinks otherwise genuine is naive.

Come Decenmber if they go tits

up due to football so be it. But to try and smear the crap outta them in prime fb deposit time is the definition of irresponsibility.

TheGeneral+ · Jul 27, 2003

Nobody had the intent of a smear campaign here. The decision was posted and the critics came with an assault. The Rx defended.

Another argument attempt here. Two topics already atleast. Glad you could finally get caught up and see the need to open another.

Imagine the wrath we would face if Royal goes under in December & they still ad here.

Lose/Lose

IntuitionBET · Jul 27, 2003

Sodium Pentethol V - Your statement above in this thread is the most Irresponsible thing we've heard in a while.

Where have you been under a ROCK?

This has been building up since last December.

How much is M.W. or B.C. paying you? Or is it Bonus monies in your Royal account?

Sodium Pentethol V · Jul 27, 2003

Which statement would that be?

The one that the chances of a book going out of business three weeks prior to FB is virtually zilch?

Save the asinine schill comments, it isn't even a book I like, I haven't bet at Royal in at least two years.

That's my opinion and this will be my last post as the ghost alert alarm is going bonkers on my machine.

THE SHRINK · Jul 27, 2003

Sodium Pentathol,

No one wants Royal Sports to fail and no one here is predicting them to go out of business...

On the contrary...

BUT...

This site has the responsibility to warn other gamblers when we feel it is not safe to send money to an operator....

That is all we are trying to do....

Please don't twist things around...

Thanks,

THE SHRINK

IntuitionBET · Jul 27, 2003

Yeah the General and I are BOTH Ghosts

And even though you state you don't like Royal you had to come in here and post that PROPAGANDA.

Posturing?, Agenda?, Shill?, M.W. Polluter?

Naw you're just an Honest Gambler with concerns

Yeah Right!

Railbird · Jul 27, 2003

Shrink,

Thanks for being a lifeguard on duty, if my town of Hunington Beach didnt have budget cuts that cause lifeguards to not work past 5pm, USC would have 1 more linebacker this year.

kosar · Jul 27, 2003

General (Clone # 3),

But why would you and the other bots here act as if others keeping them up was soooo incredibly irresponsible if the other places had that same 'lose/lose' scenario? If that was the case, wouldn't *everybody* take them down? Lose/Lose and all. Kenny, as always, has a personal stake in his sudden reversal. The next time one of you drones don't jump in to defend this guy about *anything* will be the first time.

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote">quote:<HR>Originally posted by The General:

Imagine the wrath we would face if Royal goes under in December & they still ad here.

Lose/Lose<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

THE SHRINK · Jul 27, 2003

kosar,

Since all of your posts are flaming everything we do, why do you even bother to post here?

IntuitionBET · Jul 27, 2003

kosar - you M.W. Polluter...I don't work for the Rx or have a stake in it either way.

And you're full of crap dudette

Buzzsaw · Jul 27, 2003

Since when did stating the facts become a smear campaign?

TheGeneral+ · Jul 27, 2003

Kosar,

Please Quote where bot #3 said anything negative about any other site still allowing Royal to advertise. Once you establish that I will recognize your opinion as to what is going on here.

Thanks

kosar · Jul 27, 2003

Shrink,

Do you disagree with anything in my post? It's totally contradictory for your lapdog to say that the reason you took them down was because you were in a lose/lose situation, but at the same time your lapdogs criticize other sites for keeping them up. Why would they keep them up, being a lose/lose situation and all?

Also, Is this Royal thing a personal thing with you or not? Be careful here, guy.

IB,

Who said that you were employed by this site?

Also, I have nothing to do with MW other than posting there occasionaly. I have more posts here and have been here for a lot longer.

BTW- How many of your posts in the last 4 or 5 months have been bashing Royal. Give a rest brother!

kosar · Jul 27, 2003

'General',

Frankly I get you clowns mixed up. I could have been RPM or Dante. Who would know?

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote">quote:<HR>Originally posted by The General:
Kosar,

Please Quote where bot #3 said anything negative about any other site still allowing Royal to advertise. Once you establish that I will recognize your opinion as to what is going on here.

Thanks<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

TheGeneral+ · Jul 27, 2003

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote">quote:<HR> but at the same time your lapdogs criticize other sites for keeping them up. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Show me the money come-along wanna be "I know all".

You are talking chit & have not read it all or you would see that your opinion holds no merit. I have said nothing about any other site on this matter.

Bot #3 doesn't fit your theory there Kosar. You brought up clone #3, so quit talking out your azz & show proof where clone #3 fits your BS speech.

Ninja · Jul 27, 2003

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote">quote:<HR>Originally posted by Sodium Pentethol V:
Which statement would that be?

The one that the chances of a book going out of business three weeks prior to FB is virtually zilch?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
When did NAB go out of business?

neilm · Jul 27, 2003

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote">quote:<HR>Originally posted by Ninja:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote">quote:<HR>Originally posted by Sodium Pentethol V:
Which statement would that be?

The one that the chances of a book going out of business three weeks prior to FB is virtually zilch?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
When did NAB go out of business?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Mid October

lander · Jul 27, 2003

This one is beyond belief ...

Ken didn't act proactively & assume the worse with NAB & the MW clique of ass-pirates spew on about it for months ...

Now Ken is trying to protect the posters (and losing an advertiser in the process) and the MW clique of ass-pirates are STILL complaining.

C'mmon girls - let's start showing some consistantcy with your bitching ... wait, BETTER IDEA ..

How about Kosar, SP V, & TTinco ALL send Royal 5 dimes EACH ... since they're "obviously" so safe and this is just a "fabriated smear campaign by Ken"???

By all means - deposit away girls

Buzzsaw · Jul 27, 2003

lander - funny stuff

Boston1 · Jul 27, 2003

The attack on Royal has been one the most unyielding and unrelenting events ever witnessed. It is unbelievable the amount of time and effort that has spent on Royal whether you agree or disagree.

If only a portion of this time were spent on STIFF BOOKS such as Little Nasa/Omni and the others on the SBR Run List if nothing else only to remind players to beware of these Stiff Joints. To date the only thing that has really changed with Royal is that they may have slow paid 2 people. Apparently even that problem has been resolved.