? about 2 Team Parlays

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
171
Tokens
Can these be profitable in the long run. Say if you want to cut down the juice on big favorites. Ex (Parlaying S.F. and C.W.S) Thanks
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
560
Tokens
They can be profitable but always for the example that you used. You are better off playing run lines if you want to cut the juice.
 

Another Day, Another Dollar
Joined
Mar 1, 2002
Messages
42,730
Tokens
I would not recommend parlays only to anyone. Can people make money with 2 team parlays only? I think so, but not many.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 20, 2002
Messages
5,019
Tokens
I agree with General that parlays in football and basketball are bad bets unless correlated. In baseball parlays are as good as straight bet because the odds are the same.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
171
Tokens
General, i am not saying parlay all the time. Only when you have two high juice favorites. Would it make sense to parlay and cut the juice down or play them on the run line like Seven said. I am only interested in parlaying two teams and no more. Thanks
 

Another Day, Another Dollar
Joined
Mar 1, 2002
Messages
42,730
Tokens
No expert here. I do not play. Maybe 10 a year. It is hard to win a game, let alone 2. I figure there are a couple posters around here who can give statistical info.

I do wish you the best.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,276
Tokens
Parlays are a terrible play unless the two events you are playing are correlated. Pedro -300 has absolutely nothing to do with R. Johnson -280
 

New member
Joined
Feb 4, 2003
Messages
3,271
Tokens
All parlays do is make you win or lose faster. If you are a winning handicapper, you will increase your bankroll faster. If you are a losing handicapper, you will lose your money faster. Doesn't matter if you cut down the juice if you are on the wrong side anyway.

If you are wondering whether parlays are good or not, they are probably not in your situation. (Correlated parlays are a totally different story, but most books won't let you bet them anyway).
 
My English is not great, but hopefully you understand.

Lets assume that we have a Joe Public betting on events and he goes as linemakers hope, winning 50% and losing 50% of his bets, always bets with a same stake and nothing but parlays. So he is losing money because there is the vig and a lot more vig with parlays.

What kind of odds he gets on straight wager when he's parlaying teams with a 20-cent line? In this case all teams have -110, just make it simple. With a 20-cent line bookmaker commission
is about 4.55%. 100-4.55 is 95.45% and this is how much bookmaker pays out on every wager. 100*0.9545=1.909 and Americans knows that as -110. Everytime you make 2 team parlay you have to calculate 0.9545*0.9545 and with 3 team parlay 0.9545*0.9545*0.9545 to solve the vig.

True odds on single wager with a 20 cent line and the original odd was -110 and Commission 4.55%.

2 team parlay -135 (Commission 8.90%)
3 team parlay -152 (13.04%)
4 team parlay -171 (17.00%)
5 team parlay -195 (20.77%)
6 team parlay -225 (24.38%)

If you think you can make money in a long run betting -225 on single wager when true odd is -110, 6 team parlay is perfect for you.

What a about dime line (10 cent line) -105/-105. Bookmaker commission is 2.4% with a dime line, so 100-2.4=97.6%. Calculating with a same way:

True odds on single wager with a 10 cent line and the original odd was -105 and the vig 2.4%.

2 team parlay -116 (4.74%)
3 team parlay -123 (7.03%)
4 team parlay -130 (9.26%)
5 team parlay -137 (11.44%)
6 team parlay -145 (13.56%)

A free tip for sportsbooks. Offer dime line on parlays, you will get more people betting parlays because they see -105 instead of -110, not a rising vig. You might have some smart people betting NCAA parlays, but with NFL and NBA you won't lose.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,108
Tokens
Who here but me knows those stats are off.
Not so fast my friend.
Here is another way to look at this (Balls on accurate, I might add!) This is a little easier for most to understand.
The English, not bad. The math needs some work.
The vig or profit to a book on parlays has to do with the expectations (probability) of winning all games.
Factors for multiplying odds on parlays are not simply the juice on each game.
Kind of late for a math lesson, but there you have it.
If you are flipping a coin (or a 50% capper) the odds of winning a 4 teamer are simply......
50% X 50% X 50% x 50% = .0625 or 1 in 16
They pay us 10 or 11 to 1. In the case of 10 to 1 they are paying us 62.5% of what we deserve or a 60% vig.
If you are a 60% capper then
60% X 60% X 60% X 60% = .1296 or 7.716 to 1 In this case we have a great edge. But... Who hits 60% consistently.
NOBODY!!!!!
Lets look at 55%. Reasonable number
55% X 55% X 55% X 55% = .0915 or 10.928 to 1
SOOO.... You see at 55% a 4 team parlay is a mathmatically reasonable proposition strickly by the vig.
But... You have to hit ALL FOUR of the plays to get paid.
Hence the huge edge to the book!
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,580
Messages
13,452,572
Members
99,423
Latest member
lbplayer
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com