Patience to just play the dogs? Does anyone strictly play + money?

Journeyman · Jul 25, 2003

I`ve seen "basesareloaded" talk about this never laying any juice...

Lets say for example you had the patience to only pull the trigger on dogs, decent sized dogs at +140 or higher...

Does anyone follow this strict discipline of only playing moneyline dogs?

SSI · Jul 25, 2003

jman, i try something like this in the nfl.. patience is required when doing this strategy.. in bases, you can be well below .500 and still make a profit.. must know what live dogs are..

TheGeneral+ · Jul 25, 2003

I assure many do. Value is the reason. When there are games + money, why play - money.

Journeyman · Jul 25, 2003

I know a while back maybe as far back as last year someone did a breakdown on blindly taking a +150 dog...I can`t remember what the percentage was..Is it safe to say blindly taking a +150 dog will lose money? I`m curious about this?

bunyon · Jul 25, 2003

Anybody playing Baltimore and Tampa Bay yesterday know exactly what you guys are talking about. How often does 2 large dogs like that hit on the same night? I might need to re think my strategy.

vinividivinci · Jul 25, 2003

Journeyman

When you bet anything blindly, the only way to make money is for the bookmaker to lose money.

Now, answer your own question.

VVV

SSI · Jul 25, 2003

keep up with it for a week jman, play the +1.20 - +1.50 dogs, then we shall see how it does..

-Slim- · Jul 25, 2003

I've always wanted to know, what percentage of +200 dogs hit on the alternate runline.....

Those have to pay like a shitload no?

anyone have stats on something like this?

Journeyman · Jul 25, 2003

Vini , I`m just talking ,lol, don`t take everything i say literally my friend..

vinividivinci · Jul 25, 2003

J-man

Did not mean any offense. Thought you were asking a serious question. Did not see anything to cause me to think otherwise.

BTW, stand firm by my answer.

VVV