My Canbet story

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
334
Tokens
Since my Sportbet saga elicited such a slew of responses last night, I figured I'd regale y'all with the story of my long-running feud with another well-regarded sportsbook: Canbet. Unfortunately, this one doesn't have as happy an ending as the Sportbet story...not yet anyway.

I became a Canbet customer back in 1998, after trying multitudes of other sportsbooks. When I finally discovered Canbet, I was hooked, and used it virtually to the exclusion of all others for the next four years. I liked the simple layout, the excellent customer service, the quick payouts, and the fact that when these guys spoke English with an accent, it was 'exotic'..not a reflection of their tenuous control of the language, as is the case with CS people in many Caribbean based books.

I recommended umpteen players to Canbet, and over the duration of my 'relationship' with them, easily bet hundreds of thousands -- perhaps over a million -- dollars (no exaggeration). Like most sports bettors, I lost far more often than I won -- in fact, when they drastically changed their layout a couple of years ago, I wrote them an email telling them what I thought of the design, ending it by quipping (only half-jokingly) that as the primary financier of their new web-design, I had a right to have my opinion heard.
icon_smile.gif
On those few occasions when I did cash out winnings, the payout was quick (money appeared in Neteller within an hour...and in the days before Neteller, bank-to-bank withdrawals were free and appeared in my account within days) and the service was cordial. When they made mistakes in my favor, I would advise them and they'd give me bonuses. The relationship was pleasant and professional.

As you might expect, their good-naturedness lasted only as long as my bad luck did. When things finally began to turn around for the better in the spring of 2002, their attitude towards me changed markedly.

Between January and April, 2002, I made some $13,000 in profits on Canbet primarily on NBA betting...my longest and most successful run in 5 years of online wagering. Although Canbet paid every one of my payout requests in that period, 'problems' suddenly started to crop up in my account. It began with severe restrictions on the maximum amount I can bet. This was quasi-understandable...on the one hand, I know that books try to limit their susceptibility to massive losses by curtailing the ability of sharps and professionals to bet high. But considering the amount of money I had lost to Canbet over the years, their taking such drastic actions against me of all people was paranoid, to say the least.

I was still able to bet substantial enough sums of money to keep me happy, even after the restrictions went into place. But around NBA playoff time last year, things became unbearable. Someone or someone(s) at Canbet actually began deleting my NBA bets off the system! Read that sentence again...it's true. But let me clarify: placing a bet on Canbet is a multi-pronged process, (as it is with most other books)...first you select your games, then you press "submit", then "add to ticket", then confirm. There's a lot of clicking that goes on for each bet. I would select my bets, begin the clicking process and everything was fine. But when I got to the final confirmation step, my ticket was often empty! I'd start over, resubmit, and once again, when I got to the final stage, my bet would be deleted.

They never actually deleted a bet that was confirmed and placed on the system. Those were always honored. But it was as though there was a race on between myself and whoever happened to be manning the system at Canbet every evening...if they saw action coming in from me, immediately they would rush to erase my bet before it could be confirmed. Much to my chagrin, they succeeded most of the time, and potential profits lost went well into the four digits.

After failing to make any headway with Canbet's management, I submitted a lengthy complaint letter to the Australian Gambling Commission. After almost a year, they responded with an equally lengthy report of their findings. Their conclusion? Canbet didn't owe me a dime. I appealed the decision and several months later the Commission responded again, after conducting all the check-ups and interviews required for the procedure. The end result? The same. The Commission concluded that Canbet 'probably' did delete my bets deliberately, but under Australian gaming law, they had the right to delete any bets that they didn't want to take prior to their being confirmed. The Commission's report recommended that Canbet change its rules/policies section to clearly state that they reserve the right to delete wagers they don't want to take, even as far as the final confirmation screen, so that disputes like mine wouldn't arise again in the future. But even though that policy wasn't explicitly stated on their site, the Commission ruled that Canbet had indeed acted within the bounds of the law and thus, I was owed no money.

I'm currently in the process of appealing that decision to a higher governmental authority in Australia. I believe enough in the merits of my case to continue fighting it more than a year after the bets in question took place, and even though submitting this latest appeal cost me $210. I'm scheduled to have a hearing by telephone soon after dozens of pages of correspondence and evidence have been exchanged; I'll let you all know how it turns out.

I share this story with y'all for a couple of reasons. Firstly, if you're a small-time player or one who loses a lot more often than he wins, you can't do any better than Canbet. Their payouts come lightning quick and there's always someone available at customer service (though the late-nite guy had a tendency to be a bit surly.) But if you're a 'sharp', a 'pro', or even a perennial loser like myself who gets hot for a few months or a few grand, be prepared to have all kinds of heat come down on you. Canbet does not like to lose, and they will resort to any kind of conniving, low, deceitful, and cheating -- yet 'within the confines of the law' -- methods that they need to make sure that your money remains in their pocket.

So long as you don't quibble with that minor little preference on their part, they'll give you excellent customer service with a smile. And a helluva cute accent.
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
80,046
Tokens
incredible story...racing you to delete bets,,, why wouldn`t you just call them in at that point? crazy accusation , hope they can give their side to this one,lol....
 

SportsOptions/Line up with the pros
Joined
Jul 20, 2000
Messages
13,227
Tokens
Dogs - let me get this straight as it is late and I am drunk on NyQuil. I am familiar with the CANBET screen and how to get a bet in. Kind of a 2 step process I guess. I usually line them up and then when done submit them to part two all at the same time unless time is of essence. What you are saying is that when you make the first step in getting the bet in they delete them there before you actually submit them as confirmed bets? If so how can you sue over bets not placed? In other words they are deleting the bets before they are placed and you are aware of it but still suing them?? For what? For what you say you would have won had the bets gone through?

Look to me I may not like it but anytime a book does not accept a bet and I am aware of it before the game is played I don't have much to beef about. It's when books accept bets and say nothing until a player wins and then cancels them that I am upset. Unless I am confused how can you sue anyone over this? I agree if what you say is true it would be irritating as hell but can't see any damages involved. "Well I would have went 48-2 had those bets been placed so you guys owe me 25 dimes". Not to make light of this but is what I am saying summing this up correctly. You are suing that the bets you would have made had they accepted them should be paid? Not sure you can make them accept a bet from you, heck they can just boot you if they wanted to. If they cancelled them before the games and you were aware of it you could have bet them elsewhere. What am I missing?
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
80,046
Tokens
yes ...I agree , you can`t sue for what you may have won! I never knew books did this, actually rejected wagers...
 

SportsOptions/Line up with the pros
Joined
Jul 20, 2000
Messages
13,227
Tokens
>>>They never actually deleted a bet that was confirmed and placed on the system. Those were always honored. But it was as though there was a race on between myself and whoever happened to be manning the system at Canbet every evening...if they saw action coming in from me, immediately they would rush to erase my bet before it could be confirmed. Much to my chagrin, they succeeded most of the time, and potential profits lost went well into the four digits.<<<


To me his own words vindicate CANBET, they have never not honored a bet they accepted. Certainly an inconvenience if bets weren't allowed to be placed but hardly grounds for a lawsuit in my opinion.

No offense Dogs but this will be a tough one to win. I have been wrong many times in my life though. Hell I have had wagers not accepted in my time too, lots of them for one reason or another. I just try and get it down somewhere else. Let me know if you win this one and who your lawyer was.
icon_wink.gif
 

New member
Joined
Dec 20, 2002
Messages
3,183
Tokens
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Journeyman:
incredible story...racing you to delete bets,,, why wouldn`t you just call them in at that point? crazy accusation , hope they can give their side to this one,lol....<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

I have also heard that Canbet was behind the Kennedy assassinations, and that they have minority ownership in Area 51.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
334
Tokens
Patrick --

Pardon me for not being clear.

The process for betting with Canbet is as follows: first, you check the game/side/total you want to bet on. Then you press a button...I forget exactly what the button says (been a long time since I've bet with Canbet, as you might imagine...I think it says "Submit", if I remember correctly). Then your bets appear at the top of the screen, where you have a chance to make modifications. Then you press another button, again, I forget what the button says (perhaps "Add to Ticket"). Then your bets appear on a confirmation screen where you have an opportunity to press "confirm" or "cancel". Once you press confirm, your bet is finalized.

In the cases that I'm suing for, I was able to get my bets at least through the first two steps of the process, but when I pressed "confirm", the ticket suddenly became blank, as the bet had been deleted.

Interestingly, every bet that's added to your ticket -- even if it is subsequently deleted by either the player or Canbet -- is logged in to some permanent file. I didn't know this before I began the whole litigation process, but when I made my allegations to the Commission, they were able to confirm that I had indeed submitted the very wagers I claimed to have submitted, but they were never confirmed. It was on this basis that they concluded that the bets were probably deleted by Canbet. So to answer your question: no, you cannot blanketly claim that you would've bet winners on every game if the bets hadn't been deleted, since there's a record of every bet that goes through SOME stage of the submission process.

The Commission essentially concluded that although there was a record of my having attempted to place the bets that I claimed to have attempted to place, because the bet did not reach the final confirmation process Canbet had a right to delete them. Essentially, the Commission acknowledged the 'finger-race' that was going down between myself and some crook at Canbet, and ruled that in those cases where Canbet deleted my wager before I had a chance to confirm it, that was fair game and my bet should not stand. That is the decision I'm in the process of appealing with a higher authority in Australia now.

That leads me to another point: the Australian government is VERY serious about their policing of sports wagering. Although they ultimately ruled against me, the Commission did an extremely thorough job of checking the facts and confirming the allegations. It is clear that in no place in the world is a bettor's money safer than with a (reputable) book in Australia, where the government breathes down the bookies' necks and ensures that any claim of fraud by a player will be taken very seriously. Even though they ruled against me, I very much appreciated their thoroughness.
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
80,046
Tokens
Pat, your saying you go to place a wager and the book is afraid to take the action?

I`ve had books reject a wager close to gametime but never knew this happened...
 

New member
Joined
Dec 20, 2002
Messages
3,183
Tokens
"Essentially, the Commission acknowledged the 'finger-race' that was going down between myself and some crook at Canbet"
--------------------------

You're sure that this wasn't simply a matter of the 40 seconds expiring, and the screen reverting back to the betting screen ?
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
334
Tokens
100% positive Halifax. The expiration of the timer was not the issue.

Again, the Commission's final report explicitly stated that they felt that Canbet "probably" deliberately deleted my wagers. But that, in their ultimate conclusion, was within the bounds of the law -- even if the deletion took place as late as the final confirmation screen, after I had already gone through several submission clicks. Thus, in their conclusion, I was owed no money.
 

SportsOptions/Line up with the pros
Joined
Jul 20, 2000
Messages
13,227
Tokens
Dogs - I have probably used CANBET almost as much as you have, I am aware of the steps you go through to bet with them. I did not know the bets you change your mind on or the line has moved on and you end up not betting that there is a record of. Your clarification on that part of it does make a little more sense that at least there is a record of wagers you had at least tried to bet on according to your story. I was thinking your position was someone had to take your word on what you would have bet on and you were looking to get compensated based on your word of what the bets were going to be. Having "proof" of what you intended to bet at least clears that up.

I will drop out of this now as I can't pretend to know what the official ruling will be. I know how thorough the rules are they had to deal with, I once did a book to book transfer coming into CanBet and that is not the same as doing one with other books. They had certain stipulations for that as well. Anyway I do appreciate you sharing the story with us. Just sounds odd they are posted at night waiting for your bets to come in to delete them, why not just boot you? Surely they could lower your limits, trust me I know they have that power. Seems simpler for them than have a guy waiting for you to delete your bets in the staging area. Keep us posted, interesting posts from you the last two days.

BTW you know they are no longer in Australia right? Not sure how if any that will affect your case.
 

New member
Joined
Dec 20, 2002
Messages
3,183
Tokens
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by dogs24:
100% positive Halifax. The expiration of the timer was not the issue.

Again, the correspondence from the Commission explicitly stated that they felt that Canbet "probably" deliberately deleted my wagers. But that, in their ultimate conclusion, was not illegal.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

I can fathom the possibility of Canbet somehow setting it up on their computer system to prohibit your bets, but I don't buy the premise that there were human beings waiting and watching for your bets, in order to manually delete them. I mean, how long does it take to go through the steps to place a bet at Canbet - I know it takes me about 5 seconds at the most (unless I'm betting a scalp and verifying the other price while I let the 40 seconds tick down).
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
334
Tokens
Patrick and Halifax --

Both of you seem to doubt my story. If you'd like, I'll send you a copy of the Commission's report so that you can see that they concluded that Canbet did in fact 'probably' delete my wagers. I know that sounds unbelievable, but it's true: I claim it, and the Australian Gaming Commission, who investigated my case for a year, came up with the same conclusion.

Patrick -- I wondered the same thing about why Canbet never booted me. It certainly doesn't make sense for them to go through the trouble of sitting there and deleting wagers. I ultimately arrived at the same conclusion you did; perhaps some obscure Australian law prevents them from kicking off players with whom they cannot demonstrate any wrongdoing? I have no evidence of such a law existing, but I suspect that might be what it is...otherwise, it made no sense for them to keep me around.

And to clarify, again: nobody's taking anyone's word on anything. There is (apparently) a written record logged into the system every time you submit a wager but cancel it before it is actually confirmed. It was that record, housed somewhere on Canbet's computers I suppose, that allowed the Commission to confirm that I did in fact attempt to place the wagers I claimed to have tried to make.

I did NOT know that Canbet is no longer in Australia. When did they move?? Why? The latest report I got from the Commission is dated June 4, and in it they recommended several changes to Canbet's posted rules in light of my case. I wonder if Canbet, not wanting to comply with those changes, decided to pick up shop and move elsewhere? Wow...could I have effectuated such a change, or am I just being egotistical? Where did they move to? A country with less stringent laws?
 

New member
Joined
Dec 20, 2002
Messages
3,183
Tokens
"A country with less stringent laws?"
-------------------

Yes - England.

More favourable tax environment, and only 5 hours time difference from EST.
 

SportsOptions/Line up with the pros
Joined
Jul 20, 2000
Messages
13,227
Tokens
Dogs - Not sure I would classify me as not taking your word on it as much as I am thinking you just don't have a case. Nothing against you but I have found that it's best to hear both sides of a story, certainly don't wish you any harm. I know they can limit what you wager and have no problems doing that, why wouldn't they just do that rather than go through all this trouble? I have deleted wagers from the staging area myself, could I get the money back if those bets won? In the report do they say they can tell if a wager was cancelled by you or the book? Or can they only see what was there and not who deleted it. Again just thinking out loud more than saying I don't believe you. Yes I would love to get a copy of the ruling if you don't mind. Good luck.

patrickmcirish@therx.com
 

Rx Wizard
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,438
Tokens
Dogs

I certainly believe you. I get down on a lot of action and rely on the good faith of the sportsbooks to honor the wagers they take from me (meaning because of the number of the bets I do not write down every confirmation number, date and time of the wager, etc....I rely on the pending wager screens exclusively). However, I have had experiences with both Canbet and GAMEDAY where I log in later to check a balance only to see it smaller than I expected, and when I checked to see what happened, a winning wager that I SWEAR I placed and confirmed does not appear on the transaction history as if it never was placed. Ergo, Canbet and Gameday were deleting winning wagers and placing the original stake money back in my account prior to my logging in the check my balance. I know it sounds crazy, but I swear they do that. I think shady books are resorting to that more often, esp. with players that make a lot of plays, hoping we are sloppy and do not keep a paper record so we have no way of disputing them once they delete a winning wager from the transaction history. For the first few times, we think it is OUR error (which is plausible if we are making a lot of plays).
 

SportsOptions/Line up with the pros
Joined
Jul 20, 2000
Messages
13,227
Tokens
Journeyman - no one is afraid of my action, LOL. Trust me on this one. The point I am making is that I don't like it if a book doesn't take a bet for whatever reason but if both parties are aware of that I don't think there is much in the way of "damages" to sue for. Who's to say he didn't go on and bet the game somewhere else? Again this is coming out anti-Dog but it's not really, just being honest about what I believe since this is here for opinions. Though I have seen much worse than this he still has every right to pursue anything he wants if he feels someone has inflicted damages upon him to the point he should be compensated.

As far as an example one happened this week with a newer local I started using a couple months back. He has very fair limits for a player my size and if you bet the max he will take more after he calls his partner. So far they have never turned down a bet from me. This week I called to get more on a game and they didn't want anymore even though I was below their limits. I didn't like it but I don't want to get booted so I accepted it and moved on. What else could I do? To have a contract for something both sides need to agree. If for any reason one side does not go along with it and both parties are aware of it I just can't see how this is a case. We'll see how it turns out, like I said I am far from the final authority on matters like these. Just my 02 cents.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
334
Tokens
Patrick --

I've sent you a copy of the Commission's report, unedited (except for the fact that I deleted my real name from the report and replaced it with ____)

The Commission's decision rests on two factors: one, that Canbet has a right to delete my bets before they are confirmed, and two, they claim that I past-posted several of the wagers in question. That second part is completely untrue; although many of the wagers were placed at the last possible second, Canbet automatically prevents users from adding games to their register after the game has begun, and this is a crucial point I'll be arguing in my appeal as well.

Enjoy the read!
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
334
Tokens
Journeyman --

Canbet's management accused me of manipulating their system and cheating. In the Commission's first report on my case, they made mention of the fact that "SOME" users were exploiting an unnamed flaw in Canbet's software that had since been corrected.

In the Commission's second report (an appeal decision made by the head of the Commission), they cited the indirect reference to cheating cited in the first report, but noted that the first report never accused me directly of cheating, had no evidence of my ever having cheated, and declared that whatever Canbet's perceived flaw was, and the fact that some unnamed user was exploiting it, was immaterial to my case
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,228
Messages
13,449,773
Members
99,402
Latest member
03sunwinvip
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com