* NEWS FLASH * Dont deal with these people

FatFrank · Jun 5, 2003

Anyone who's been indicted or (shame) convicted of any crime.

Of course this eliminates 95% of all offshore book owners/operators.

FatFrank · Jun 5, 2003

http://therxforum.com/6/ubb.x?a=tpc&s=100090022&f=988094022&m=84910801&r=82010411#82010411

WalkofLife · Jun 5, 2003

C'mon now, FF. Stop calling for sympathies in the forum, and answer the damn question.

What is so wrong about letting people know who they're dealing with?

Why should players not know who's handling THEIR money?

FatFrank · Jun 5, 2003

>What is so wrong about letting people know who they're dealing with?

Nothing! When or where did I say we should not?

lander · Jun 5, 2003

Frank,
I'm curious, how did you find the data to show a correlation between "stiffing" and "being convicticed of a crime"?

WalkofLife · Jun 5, 2003

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> Nothing! When or where did I say we should not? <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Here: Mods : Please Explain The "No Real Names" Rule

Now, will you answer Lander's question?

FatFrank · Jun 5, 2003

Walk of Life,

Dont need to use personal names of owners, bookies, operators or principals... Just the Name of the business.

WalkofLife · Jun 5, 2003

Fat Frank:

One thing is to name a bookie, who was persecuted in the good ol' U.S. just for takin action. Having to remain in the shadow, due to the hipocricy of a society like America is ONE thing. One OTHER thing is to call scammers by their name, as a preventive measure to avoid people to lose money based on lack of info.

On one hand you got a guy who books.

On the other hand you got a man that has scammed and stiffed a lot of people out of their money.

How can you even insinuate a remote comparison?