My apologies if this was already discussed. I am shocked that the "low 60 percents" was quoted.
Bottom line. This number is wrong. Horribly wrong. Mind boggling wrong.
I seriously doubt any handicapper with any good volume of plays can longterm hit over 57%. And 60% is ridiculous.
My best proof of this is that given any contestant in any legitimate contest (Hilton) the over/under on their percentage right for betting purposes would never even approach 60% percent.
Also, as I've shown before mathematically, betting the Kelly Criteria and hitting 60% winners leads fairly rapidly to billionaire status.
True legitimate pros and cappers strive to hit around 55% with a significant number of plays. At that level you can make a very large amount of money.
Bottom line. This number is wrong. Horribly wrong. Mind boggling wrong.
I seriously doubt any handicapper with any good volume of plays can longterm hit over 57%. And 60% is ridiculous.
My best proof of this is that given any contestant in any legitimate contest (Hilton) the over/under on their percentage right for betting purposes would never even approach 60% percent.
Also, as I've shown before mathematically, betting the Kelly Criteria and hitting 60% winners leads fairly rapidly to billionaire status.
True legitimate pros and cappers strive to hit around 55% with a significant number of plays. At that level you can make a very large amount of money.
