A bank robber had a change of heart and returned to the bank he had just held up to return the money. But Milwaukee police were already at the downtown bank investigating the robbery Wednesday afternoon when the 35-year-old alleged robber returned to ask...
CAN'T FIND THE FULL ARTICLE..IT HAPPENED IN WISCONSIN
CAN'T FIND THE FULL ARTICLE..IT HAPPENED IN WISCONSIN
I've always has mixed opinions when it comes to the law and cases like this. I don't think he should be charged fully. He DIDNT HAVE TO return the money and may of gotten away with it. We/they always look at the bad side of things and rarely consider the good. Then again, here's another thing that makes things even more questionable in cases like this. A guy rapes a woman and faces trial.Let's say the only reason he is caught is because the lady recognizes him herself. The rapist then testifies in court that he feels his sentence should be lessened because he was going to kill the lady after raping her, to basically eliminate the chance of what just happened, her ever being able to identify him, but he then has a change of heart, sparing her life. Should his sentence not be as severe??
Uhhh...I seriously doubt the charge will be any different. If he didn't have the money, he'd be ordered to pay restitution. This may eliminate that, at best.
You guys act like giving back the money somehow negates the criminal act. He'd have to pay it back in any case, so nothing really changes.
His "change of heart" should've taken place after he thought of it and before he acted.
You guys act like giving back the money somehow negates the criminal act. He'd have to pay it back in any case, so nothing really changes.
His "change of heart" should've taken place after he thought of it and before he acted.
