Posters your help is needed pre Watchdog Conference

Search

Posters your help is needed pre Watchdog Conference

  • One month

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Two months

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Three months

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Four months

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Six months

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,028
Tokens
We need you guys to help define the following question:

"How long of period of time should a book go after a slow-pay history before it is officially considered NOT a slow-pay* book.?"

*assumes there are no further slow-pays

Feel free to post another time frame if you have a different opinion from choices listed.

Of course I don't make the rules but I would appreciate those attending the meeting to refrain from arguing or stating their position until the players have been able to weigh in.
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
80,046
Tokens
Buzz, I think you would have to be more specific to get a real strong opinion...

A slow pay history like Royal ?

I'd say a minimum of 6 months from last verified slow pay...
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,238
Tokens
I believe if you had 5 years as an option 85% of everyone who votes will be on that time frame. If you have ever been the victim of a books bullshit just to hang on to your money that much longer, IMO most people want to take their money and run out of a book that slow payed them. With the competion seemingly growing everyday and more to come in the following weeks with foots about to start, <span class="ev_code_RED">SLOW PAY IS A NO PAY UNTIL YOU GET YOUR CASH!!!</span>
applaudit.gif
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2003
Messages
42,910
Tokens
depends wether it is a couple of isolated inncidents...

or a string of systemic incidents....
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,028
Tokens
OK. I would say a "normal" slow-pay mode but each one is unique.
 

Another Day, Another Dollar
Joined
Mar 1, 2002
Messages
42,730
Tokens
You know, as I ponder this question I keep thinking it is important to know the reasons for slow pays obviously. There can be many reasons for a slow pay to occur. Not going to say it is right under any circumstance, but it can happen. Buzzsaw, if I call a book today and they say all payments have been made and this is why that it happened and we have repaired this issue, then I think 90 days is very sufficient to see if any further occurrences happen. If the book can go 90 days without a legit slow pay then I see reason to feel good they have fixed the issue.
 

ODU GURU
Joined
Feb 26, 1999
Messages
20,881
Tokens
Good Topic Buzzsaw!

I'd really love to hear from more of you about this....

THE SHRINK
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
38
Tokens
The General brings up some good points. It is possible that a slow-pay may be due to customer service mistakes. They may offer to rectify the situation and may be honest about the error. It is still a slow-pay.

I think the normal slow-pay that Buzz is talking about is when the book simply misses the payout date. This isn't normally a one day error. This slow-pay shows the inability or lack of desire to pay on time.

When a book shows signs of a weak accounting department, we can not be too cautious. I would vote 6 months. A big deposit bonus program or a decent month of football can keep books a float for a couple months.
 

ODU GURU
Joined
Feb 26, 1999
Messages
20,881
Tokens
SBR,

Since a slow pay of only 5k with one account is different than a slow pay of 100 customers totalling 100k, perhaps 6 months is not going to work in all cases, but I do think it is an excellent starting point...

Ken
 

TOW

No gossip, just news
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
744
Tokens
As other are pointing out there has to be an identified trend to define a book as a slow-pay operation. I'd say 5 to 6 simultaneous complaints could be a perfect red flag to identify the slow pay Book.

"Probation" should be at least 3 months from the the date of settlement of the slowpays.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,028
Tokens
Guys,
This will never be a perfect science. But, here is a thought;

After 3 confirmed slow pays in any 90 period a book should at least enter a "Slow-pay watch". The 4th slow pay in the same 90 day period could eleveate that to an official status of a slow pay book.

I can already hear the Sportsbook.com & SIA apologists crying foul. They have a reasonable arguement that these big books handle more clients.

But when it comes to slow-pays, no player should be left behind right? These big books also have bigger budgets and an equal arguement could be made that they should never have a slow pay.
 

ODU GURU
Joined
Feb 26, 1999
Messages
20,881
Tokens
I agree with you on this point Buzzsaw...

3 strikes and you are out...

errr...slowpay

P.S.

Can you shoot me an email?

Ken
 

New member
Joined
Jul 20, 2000
Messages
11,802
Tokens
I voted for 90 days without a slow pay.

it would have to be more than one occurrance to be considered a slow pay at all imo

panther
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
56
Tokens
Buzzsaw, shrink, TOW Cut the CRAP!

WE all know if a book has one(1) slow pay there is a SERIOUS cash management problem/or unprofessionaly managed payout system.

If they DO NOT have the players post-up monies READY-To-GO then that means they are playing with players hard-Earn monies and DO NOT have the right amount of "Cash Reserves" to professional run this type of business.

Anything else you try to feed us means that you just keeping a BLIND EYE to the above FACTS.

Buzzsaw but to answer your unprofessional question...the minimum should be for at least 12 months, an entire season.

If you are really going to be REAL WatchDOGs for the PLAYERS.......you have to STOP helping Unprofessionally ran and UNDER funded books as in the long run it hurts everyone.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
56
Tokens
When you drunken boys stop slobering/tripping over each other and sober up how about a serious reply to the above?

Thanks
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
56
Tokens
When you drunken boys stop slobering/tripping over each other and sober up how about a serious reply to the above?

Thanks...
 

Active member
Joined
Oct 20, 1999
Messages
75,444
Tokens
Satan- I personally attended the watchdog meeting and will give more of my thoughts on what transpired when I arrive home.

However, speaking strictly from a players standpoint, you as a player should feel very lucky to have the likes of TOW, SBR, and SHRINK involved in this industry.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,515
Messages
13,452,115
Members
99,417
Latest member
selectionpartners
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com