House 9/11 Bill Could Cost $15 Billion
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=2 width=420 border=0><TBODY><TR vAlign=center><TD width="40%"><!-- Yahoo TimeStamp: 1097016168 --><!-- recent_timestamp 1097016168 4208 secs not stale 28800 secs -->1 hour, 10 minutes ago
</TD><TD noWrap align=right width="60%"><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=2 width="1%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD width="1%">
</TD><TD noWrap width="99%"> Politics - U. S. Congress</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<!-- TextStart -->By JESSE J. HOLLAND, Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON - A House Republican bill to implement the Sept. 11 panel's recommendations could cost almost $15 billion over five years, congressional budget officials said, as the Senate moved Tuesday to finish its version of the legislation.
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="1%" align=left border=0><TBODY><TR vAlign=top><TD width="99%"></TD><TD width=5> </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
The Congressional Budget Office (news - web sites) — Congress nonpartisan budget analysts — estimated that the House bill, which creates a national intelligence director as well as increases anti-terrorism, identity theft, illegal immigration and border security powers, could cost $14.9 billion between 2005-2009.
House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., said it would be worth it. "What does it cost us to have a 9/11 event? What would it cost us to have another 9/11 event?" he asked Tuesday.
The speaker said he thinks "$15 billion is a — and I don't even know if that's correct — sound insurance policy to ensure that we protect the people in this country."
House leaders plan to bring their bill to the floor Wednesday. Democrats complain that the GOP wrote a partisan bill that covers fully only 11 of the commission's 41 recommendations, and that House GOP leaders even took out some of their amendments that were successful in committee.
Democratic members also contend Republican leaders are refusing to let the Democrats offer the Senate legislation instead of what they consider the flawed House bill.
House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi of California called the Republican bill "weak where it should be strong," in areas such as security at the nation's ports and railways. "We can do better, and we must," she said.
House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, R-Texas, said the House GOP bill is better than the Senate's.
"What we did is make Americans safer," DeLay said. "We didn't rubber-stamp it, we didn't play politics, we didn't play to the election or to any media. We actually read the report. ... There's nothing in this bill that is not addressed by the 9/11 commission's report or in its recommendations."
House leaders plan to have their bill up for a final vote later this week. The Senate moved Tuesday to also get a final vote on its bill before the end of the week.
Senators, on an 85-10 vote, decided to limit debate and amendments on their legislation. That makes it more likely that the bill could be finished before the Senate's proposed adjournment date of Friday.
The Senate also added on a provision by from Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., to tighten holes in aviation security by authorizing more than $800 million to protect cargo and passenger planes, streamline checked baggage screening, improve airport perimeter security, hire more federal air marshals and develop new security technology.
The Senate bill — which the CBO said would cost $700 million before adding the cost of the amendments like Rockefeller's proposal — does not contain the various additional powers in the House version.
If the two bills do not match after final passage, the House and Senate must come together to negotiate a version that can be sent to the White House for the president's signature.
Sen. Susan Collins (news, bio, voting record), R-Maine, the chief GOP sponsor of the Senate bill, had said Monday that she and chief Democratic sponsor Joseph Lieberman, D-Conn., already are meeting with House Intelligence members to work out some of the issues.
"I hope that we can complete action this week," Collins said. "If not, then I think we could complete action in October and come back later this month for a day to vote on the conference report."
Pelosi had doubts. The House bill is not compatible with the Senate version, she said, and "it will be hard to see how these bills will be conferenced — they are very, very different."
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="1%" align=left border=0><TBODY><TR vAlign=top><TD width="99%"></TD><TD width=5> </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Some Democrats say the job of reaching compromise would be easier if the White House would help.
"The president can pick up the phone and tell Tom DeLay and Hastert and say, 'Look, I want the bill and quit fooling around and get this thing narrowed down,' and it's done," said Sen. Christopher Dodd (news, bio, voting record), D-Conn.
"So, there's no mystery here," Dodd said. "It seems quite clear to me the administration is hostile to the idea."
<!-- TextEnd -->
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="1%" align=left border=0><TBODY><TR vAlign=top><TD width="99%"></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=2 width=420 border=0><TBODY><TR vAlign=center><TD width="40%"><!-- Yahoo TimeStamp: 1097016168 --><!-- recent_timestamp 1097016168 4208 secs not stale 28800 secs -->1 hour, 10 minutes ago
</TD><TD noWrap align=right width="60%"><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=2 width="1%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD width="1%">
</TD><TD noWrap width="99%"> Politics - U. S. Congress</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><!-- TextStart -->By JESSE J. HOLLAND, Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON - A House Republican bill to implement the Sept. 11 panel's recommendations could cost almost $15 billion over five years, congressional budget officials said, as the Senate moved Tuesday to finish its version of the legislation.
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="1%" align=left border=0><TBODY><TR vAlign=top><TD width="99%"></TD><TD width=5> </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
The Congressional Budget Office (news - web sites) — Congress nonpartisan budget analysts — estimated that the House bill, which creates a national intelligence director as well as increases anti-terrorism, identity theft, illegal immigration and border security powers, could cost $14.9 billion between 2005-2009.
House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., said it would be worth it. "What does it cost us to have a 9/11 event? What would it cost us to have another 9/11 event?" he asked Tuesday.
The speaker said he thinks "$15 billion is a — and I don't even know if that's correct — sound insurance policy to ensure that we protect the people in this country."
House leaders plan to bring their bill to the floor Wednesday. Democrats complain that the GOP wrote a partisan bill that covers fully only 11 of the commission's 41 recommendations, and that House GOP leaders even took out some of their amendments that were successful in committee.
Democratic members also contend Republican leaders are refusing to let the Democrats offer the Senate legislation instead of what they consider the flawed House bill.
House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi of California called the Republican bill "weak where it should be strong," in areas such as security at the nation's ports and railways. "We can do better, and we must," she said.
House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, R-Texas, said the House GOP bill is better than the Senate's.
"What we did is make Americans safer," DeLay said. "We didn't rubber-stamp it, we didn't play politics, we didn't play to the election or to any media. We actually read the report. ... There's nothing in this bill that is not addressed by the 9/11 commission's report or in its recommendations."
House leaders plan to have their bill up for a final vote later this week. The Senate moved Tuesday to also get a final vote on its bill before the end of the week.
Senators, on an 85-10 vote, decided to limit debate and amendments on their legislation. That makes it more likely that the bill could be finished before the Senate's proposed adjournment date of Friday.
The Senate also added on a provision by from Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., to tighten holes in aviation security by authorizing more than $800 million to protect cargo and passenger planes, streamline checked baggage screening, improve airport perimeter security, hire more federal air marshals and develop new security technology.
The Senate bill — which the CBO said would cost $700 million before adding the cost of the amendments like Rockefeller's proposal — does not contain the various additional powers in the House version.
If the two bills do not match after final passage, the House and Senate must come together to negotiate a version that can be sent to the White House for the president's signature.
Sen. Susan Collins (news, bio, voting record), R-Maine, the chief GOP sponsor of the Senate bill, had said Monday that she and chief Democratic sponsor Joseph Lieberman, D-Conn., already are meeting with House Intelligence members to work out some of the issues.
"I hope that we can complete action this week," Collins said. "If not, then I think we could complete action in October and come back later this month for a day to vote on the conference report."
Pelosi had doubts. The House bill is not compatible with the Senate version, she said, and "it will be hard to see how these bills will be conferenced — they are very, very different."
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="1%" align=left border=0><TBODY><TR vAlign=top><TD width="99%"></TD><TD width=5> </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Some Democrats say the job of reaching compromise would be easier if the White House would help.
"The president can pick up the phone and tell Tom DeLay and Hastert and say, 'Look, I want the bill and quit fooling around and get this thing narrowed down,' and it's done," said Sen. Christopher Dodd (news, bio, voting record), D-Conn.
"So, there's no mystery here," Dodd said. "It seems quite clear to me the administration is hostile to the idea."
<!-- TextEnd -->
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="1%" align=left border=0><TBODY><TR vAlign=top><TD width="99%"></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
