Scott Peterson Murder Trial... A Verdict Reached

Search

New member
Joined
Jun 20, 2004
Messages
4,663
Tokens
i think he is guilty as anybody but if he is convicted its very very shady now with the dismissmal of 2 jurors this late in the game. could be the 2 jurors who thought he was innocent and werent budging..

too coincidental that they dismiss 2 then they reach a verdict
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
80,046
Tokens
Well obvious to me, the two that were tossed must have been holding out...What a crazy trial...I'm sure this sets up a good appeal...
 

New member
Joined
Jun 20, 2004
Messages
4,663
Tokens
its just further proof of what a complete joke the justice system is
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
4,703
Tokens
This system totally sux. Hes as guilty as guilty can be. A white OJ,lol. This cock sucker needs to be taught a lesson either in prison or on the streets, someone will give him the beating of his life and he totally deserves it IMO.
 

Another Day, Another Dollar
Joined
Mar 1, 2002
Messages
42,730
Tokens
Very odd how this is pannig out. I have no idea if he is guilty or not, but this is odd. Could we expect anything else?
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
80,046
Tokens
If anyone looked guilty just by his actions/mannerisms alone its this guy...the talking heads on Court TV are downright giddy this is finally going down..
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
4,703
Tokens
If I was a relative of Laci's I'd hope he gets off so hes fair game on the streets!!
 

New member
Joined
Jun 20, 2004
Messages
4,663
Tokens
I say he is innocent on man 1 and guilty on man 2, the introduction of man 2 was just another way the judge tried to garuantee a conviction
 

New member
Joined
Jun 21, 2004
Messages
4,336
Tokens
yeah I found it interesting that the judge brought in Man 2 charges just cause he figured they wouldnt get him on the death penalty.

good luck in jail.
 

Freelance Gynecologist
Joined
Oct 28, 2004
Messages
54
Tokens
I think you guys may be right about the timing being ironic after the dismissals. On FauxNews at lunch it was even reported that one of the jury that was dismissed was a doctor or something and the two reasons given for his dismissal were that he just really wanted off and that he was a troublemaker. What the Hell does all that mean? How many of us picked for jury duty WANT to just "get off the jury" and even worse for Peterson, not that I care, is that if he was a troublemaker that means he probably was not convinced or didn't want to convict. Also strange in that case was the boat parked outside with the stuffed dummy with the head cut off. Supposedly Garrigos had a part in that. What would that gain him? He always has a motive for that kind of trick.

At the very least, I would think there would be grounds for appeal of the verdict with so much jury upheaval during deliberation, of all times.
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
80,046
Tokens
I agree Noreaga...same thing i thought at that time...the evidence all still circumstancial , you never know...
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
4,703
Tokens
Scott Peterson will make someone a good wife in prison. Better sleep with your ARSE against the wall A sshole!!
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
963
Tokens
guilty yes-1800 innocent +1400
other result +5000.

It's LA He ain't black or a cop so he is quilty.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
975
Tokens
It would certinly seem like he's guilty but the media plays tricks with our minds making us believe what they want us to and what makes for better TV. That being said there dont seem to be any real evidience against him but I think he may get murder 2 anyway. By the judge throwing in murder 2 it seems like the judge thinks he guilty but not sure if the jury would find him guilty of murder 1 so he made they're choice easier with murder 2
 

New member
Joined
Sep 19, 2001
Messages
2,857
Tokens
Guilty, yes. Proving it is something else. I can't convict someone on circumstancial evidence since there will always be that .0000001 percent chance he is not guilty.
 

Another Day, Another Dollar
Joined
Mar 1, 2002
Messages
42,730
Tokens
The dismissed juror was very much for Not guilty, stating there was not enough concrete evidence for him. His guess was not guilty. Only thing he said the Pros proved was that peterson was a liar.

We shall see
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,459
Tokens
I thought this guy was guilty when he was caught with dyed hair and the cash. C'mon...no spin needed there. How can you possibly explain that away?

At least I would admit that and they would toss me off the jury. Unfortunately for the justice system and all of us, many of the folks on juries are the LAST people I would want deciding my fate.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,106,907
Messages
13,439,490
Members
99,345
Latest member
08winlink
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com