Anyone NOT drunk now , tell me the REFS did not have money on this game

Dante · Dec 5, 2004

Did anyone see the calls towards the end..the Chris hope call for illegal touching or whatever it was the giy did not even come CLOSE to touching him...

at least 4 calls where done wrong...im happy with the win but the refs had the +3.5 im 100% sure

JimFiestSux · Dec 5, 2004

Dante,

If they did they would've NEVER allowed that touchdown where the ball hit the ground to count to let Pitt go up 14-7.

Dante · Dec 5, 2004

Jimmy...when he crossed the line he had he ball the ground can not cause the fumble they got that one right IMO

michael777 · Dec 5, 2004

he did not catch that ball

JimFiestSux · Dec 6, 2004

Not going to argue but the ball was loose before he hit the ground. IF ANYTHING he might have had it when he crossed the goal line but the ground definitely didn't cause anything.

-Slim- · Dec 6, 2004

there is no way in hell that Pitt 2nd TD was a catch, absolutely no way....

Glaken · Dec 6, 2004

Not Drunk, The officiating in most games today was a joke...I won't say they cheated (but I might after three weeks of this crap); I am spending my Monday charting ref calls that are newbies....I saw lots of bogus calls....mostly for the home teams.....We are coming to a critical time in NFL and NCAAFB officiating...I have no respect for them anymore. All of the "Experienced Refs" retired during week 8......BTW I didn't see any NBA Refs in the Pacers-Pistons fight....you won't see them on the floor again either.

Glaken · Dec 6, 2004

Slim Your right! That was BS.....The best part was the idiot had the head phones on backwards.....even the announcers were laughing at him.

Illini · Dec 6, 2004

I would have to agree with everyone that said that was not a touchdown. No way he ever had possession of that ball. So there's no way the refs had money on the game. The Michigan St-Hawaii game might be a different story though.