Let cities vote on gambling

Search

Another Day, Another Dollar
Joined
Mar 1, 2002
Messages
42,730
Tokens
The mayors of Cleveland and Cincinnati are working together to push a November 2005 ballot issue that would allow individual cities to decide whether to legalize gambling.

Ohio voters have twice rejected casino gambling referendums. The key to the latest proposal is to let voters allow a city to make the call, rather than a strict up-or-down vote to legalize gambling in Ohio.


"I think it's likely that in November 2005 Ohio voters will be asked to approve some kind of casino measure," Cincinnati Mayor Charlie Luken said Sunday.

Luken said it would be a tough sell in the rural parts of the state and with Ohio Gov. Bob Taft, who opposes the issue.

That's why the mayors hope if the focus is just on cities, voters would be more willing to pass a measure.

"We think that's the best message: Let Cleveland decide what is right for Cleveland," said Cleveland Mayor Jane Campbell.

The proposal came after months of private discussions, according to Campbell, who first pitched the idea last week in outlining her vision for the city's future.

"This is not something I just hatched," Campbell said of her casino announcement.

In the last four months, Campbell met a half-dozen times with Cuyahoga County Commissioner Peter Lawson Jones, Joe Roman of the Greater Cleveland Partnership and Ernie Novak, board chairman of the Convention and Visitors Bureau of Greater Cleveland, to discuss the idea.

Campbell and Luken also have met to discuss the issue, as recently as two weeks ago.

Ohio allows bingo, wagering on horse races and a state-sponsored lottery but forbids casino gambling.

Roman, whose organization represents businesses in the region, will lead a 90-day study to look at the economics of gambling in Ohio. The study will gauge how many Ohioans gamble and how many regularly travel to casinos out of state.

"The numbers will tell us the market and how many travel to Detroit, to Indiana, to Canada," Roman said. "We need to know what that means."

Luken said he already knows what it means: Too many Ohioans are spending money in other states.

"We're watching all this money go to other states and it's just silly," he said.

Roman has been marshaling support from Cleveland's business community and will travel to Cincinnati to enlist the help of business leaders.

Jeff Jacobs, a Cleveland developer whose company operates several casinos in other states and owns property in the Flats entertainment district in Cleveland, said casino proponents might be overreaching in a state that has consistently voted against gambling.


"They're swinging for a home run," said Jacobs, who said a more modest proposal might fare better. "They might need to dual-track those efforts with something that is more of a single or double."


cincypost.com
 

CURATOR / MEMBER EMERITUS
Joined
Dec 21, 1999
Messages
3,061
Tokens
Not a bad idea--as much as feasibly possible they MUST go for it all the way, pull out all stops: include horse-racing(tracks should be included to get them onboard instead of fighting the initiative), as many games & possibly sports betting as well as full internet/tv/otb/account wagering.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,781
Tokens
Cities cant decide this unless the state gives them the right to do so. A total non-starter in light of state laws.
 

Another Day, Another Dollar
Joined
Mar 1, 2002
Messages
42,730
Tokens
The right to gamble on sports, poker games, etc... should be dictated by a ballot in each state, yes sir. Let the theory of democracy work. It is a good thing when used properly.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,632
Messages
13,453,089
Members
99,426
Latest member
bodyhealthtechofficia
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com