Tough game!
VERY TOUGH!
Just my opinion, but obviously others have strong opinions on this game one way or another.
REGGIE BUSH would scare the heck out of me if i were to be betting on oklahoma................as he may prove to be the difference.
I will pass on the game and just enjoy what should be a great game.
VERY TOUGH!
Just my opinion, but obviously others have strong opinions on this game one way or another.
REGGIE BUSH would scare the heck out of me if i were to be betting on oklahoma................as he may prove to be the difference.
I will pass on the game and just enjoy what should be a great game.
the way i see it is:
Slim has posted who the public is playing in the new year's day games and the sugar bowl
if we faded the public with slim we'd be unbeaten in the BCS games and a lot of other 1-1 games
with the line going from usc -3.5 (opening line) to "pick" we know whose been getting all the money and when slim comes on here he will say he is taking TONS of OU money
knowing what we know, how can we NOT take usc now that they are "pick"!?
Slim has posted who the public is playing in the new year's day games and the sugar bowl
if we faded the public with slim we'd be unbeaten in the BCS games and a lot of other 1-1 games
with the line going from usc -3.5 (opening line) to "pick" we know whose been getting all the money and when slim comes on here he will say he is taking TONS of OU money
knowing what we know, how can we NOT take usc now that they are "pick"!?
WINKY- At this point, it is either take USC or pass, agree.
To take OLKA at pk when one could have had +3 or better is just asking for trouble IMO.
This has ALWAYS been a golden rule with me...........and that is to never take the worst of a number in a fashion similar to this.
There are THOUSANDS of games to be wagered on during a course of year, hence passing on a bad number is no big deal.
To take OLKA at pk when one could have had +3 or better is just asking for trouble IMO.
This has ALWAYS been a golden rule with me...........and that is to never take the worst of a number in a fashion similar to this.
There are THOUSANDS of games to be wagered on during a course of year, hence passing on a bad number is no big deal.
Well to say its a bad number NOW, is one thing that holds true When linemaker posted correct operner, right?
I have thought sinse the opener was hung up at USC -3, which i Never saw the 3.5 or would have taken it for sure. I still contend that the opener was a "terrible" number to open with................JMO
I have thought sinse the opener was hung up at USC -3, which i Never saw the 3.5 or would have taken it for sure. I still contend that the opener was a "terrible" number to open with................JMO
Does anyone remember the first Jets-Dolphins game this past season? The Jets opened like -3.5 and went up to 6.5 or 7. Of course anyone who bet the Jets late was an "idiot" and the bet had "no value" at that "inflated" number.
Of course the Jets won by 8 and the "idiots" cleaned up from the "sharps".
Of course the Jets won by 8 and the "idiots" cleaned up from the "sharps".
