i agree .
i thought auburn was the best team i had seen all year. we get alot of their games here in florida.
usc impressed me enough tuesday night though that i would have voted them # 1 .
utah vs usc would have been first team to 100 wins.
auburn / usc would have been one hell of a game. but then i thought okl / usc was going to be a better game too.
i thought auburn was the best team i had seen all year. we get alot of their games here in florida.
usc impressed me enough tuesday night though that i would have voted them # 1 .
utah vs usc would have been first team to 100 wins.
auburn / usc would have been one hell of a game. but then i thought okl / usc was going to be a better game too.
Q. What is the primary difference between USC, Auburn, Utah & Oklahomo?
A. Intelligence.
Utah is a little special -- they're not necessarily dum dums, but they have a higher-than-average (imagine that for a red state) rate of imbreeding, which in turn retards brain development.
A. Intelligence.
Utah is a little special -- they're not necessarily dum dums, but they have a higher-than-average (imagine that for a red state) rate of imbreeding, which in turn retards brain development.
The game was a fluke. USC isn't going to blow Oklahoma out by that much 9 times out of 10 or anything.
If they played 10 times Okie would give them plenty of good games and win at least a few times.
Not saying that USC is a fluke... But the game itself was. USC is not that many points better than any other team in the country....
Oklahoma played very poorly. It could have been Nebraska out there and you wouldn't have known the difference.
If they played 10 times Okie would give them plenty of good games and win at least a few times.
Not saying that USC is a fluke... But the game itself was. USC is not that many points better than any other team in the country....
Oklahoma played very poorly. It could have been Nebraska out there and you wouldn't have known the difference.
its pretty lame tht oklahoma played as bad as it did for auburns sake. I still think the national champion should be a split. Those teams ending up undefeated are getting screwed heavily.Usc almost lost to Cal as well as oregon state but yet they won those games as did auburn as well as utah who does not have the schedule of usc and auburn.Where does the commitee draw the line.Last year they get a piece of the national championship after a loss to cal 34-31 and this year they dont share it with an undefeated SEC team come on wht a fuking joke.What a Rotten commitee the bcs has.Not only do you have to win your bowl game you still have to convince us lame. When please tell me will there be a playoff amongst the teams that are ALL DESERVING OF THIS MAGNITUDE
