I wouldn't do it.
Too easy to get real scalps to take that risk. You're betting 23 to win 1. You got 12 seconds that can screw you. 12 seconds times the 23 is around 4.6 minutes. That's a large window. In theory, it MAY be around breakeven, maybe, but it's crazy risk. Maybe if it was +120 and +100 I could see it, though even then personally I'd pass.
Too easy to get real scalps to take that risk. You're betting 23 to win 1. You got 12 seconds that can screw you. 12 seconds times the 23 is around 4.6 minutes. That's a large window. In theory, it MAY be around breakeven, maybe, but it's crazy risk. Maybe if it was +120 and +100 I could see it, though even then personally I'd pass.
Depends on the limits. If you fiddle with the amounts you will get 5.22 per side if you can get it spilt right. Would be right around 94.8 @ +111 and 100 @ +100.
It is roughly 52 bux per 1000, definately worth it since it is simultaneous, if it were a regular scalp. You do have a 12 secod window where you can get beat both ways. But that would really bea bad beat IMO.
It is roughly 52 bux per 1000, definately worth it since it is simultaneous, if it were a regular scalp. You do have a 12 secod window where you can get beat both ways. But that would really bea bad beat IMO.
I'd definitely be on my knees for those 12 seconds.
Hopefully they'd tick off in the huddle, or before
the ball is snapped.
With over 5% scalp on either side it is a -2000
risk factor. So the odds of no score in those 12
secs would have to be better than 20-1 for this
Polish middle to have value.
Hopefully they'd tick off in the huddle, or before
the ball is snapped.
With over 5% scalp on either side it is a -2000
risk factor. So the odds of no score in those 12
secs would have to be better than 20-1 for this
Polish middle to have value.
