Since one of our main goals is to warn gamblers of betting establishments that aren't worthy of your business, I have often wondered if we can pass judgement on whether POST UP SHOPS OR CREDIT SHOPS are safer as a general guideline...
I do know that most POST UP shops that have FAILED have dipped into Players funds, whereas this problem is not an issue for CREDIT establishments...
Furthermore, if we review which of the two have had more failures, it would be the POST UP establishments.
However, since there are MORE post up operators than credit places, the % of failures is more important than the sheer number....
Again, I maintain that more POST UP bookmakers have failed percentage-wise than their counterparts...
But, is this enough to make a generalization and suggest to gamblers that as a rule, your money is SAFER betting on CREDIT?
I'd love to hear what the majority think about this...
THE SHRINK
I do know that most POST UP shops that have FAILED have dipped into Players funds, whereas this problem is not an issue for CREDIT establishments...
Furthermore, if we review which of the two have had more failures, it would be the POST UP establishments.
However, since there are MORE post up operators than credit places, the % of failures is more important than the sheer number....
Again, I maintain that more POST UP bookmakers have failed percentage-wise than their counterparts...
But, is this enough to make a generalization and suggest to gamblers that as a rule, your money is SAFER betting on CREDIT?
I'd love to hear what the majority think about this...
THE SHRINK