UWM was down by 6 at HT, the HT line was UWM-6, and UWM simply needed to win. They covered. Whoopie right?
but ...
the line went to -140, -150 and -132 in three of the books that I was following.
What I don't get is how these books set HT lines based on a chart that they have. Does anyone have the balls to change the line by a point or two when there is such one sided action? All they keep doing is raising the vig because they think there is only a 10-12 minute window in which the action will come in and they're afraid to get sided/middled.
but ...
the line went to -140, -150 and -132 in three of the books that I was following.
What I don't get is how these books set HT lines based on a chart that they have. Does anyone have the balls to change the line by a point or two when there is such one sided action? All they keep doing is raising the vig because they think there is only a 10-12 minute window in which the action will come in and they're afraid to get sided/middled.