...
Just about no gambler can always get the best number. I am good at getting good numbers and have tons of opportunities for scalps throughout each year but now and then #'s move against me as well. Morales-Pacquiao last Saturday is a good example. Morales should not have been the underdog. IMO getting him at +120 was a steal. However closer to fight time the damn number went up to +170. I was a little pissd but just could not understand that line move, made no sense to me. Anyways, I am just saying nobody can pick the line move every time. Not even someone who knows as much about boxing as myself (which is saying a lot, I see fights from all over the world).
THE SHRINK said:
Just about no gambler can always get the best number. I am good at getting good numbers and have tons of opportunities for scalps throughout each year but now and then #'s move against me as well. Morales-Pacquiao last Saturday is a good example. Morales should not have been the underdog. IMO getting him at +120 was a steal. However closer to fight time the damn number went up to +170. I was a little pissd but just could not understand that line move, made no sense to me. Anyways, I am just saying nobody can pick the line move every time. Not even someone who knows as much about boxing as myself (which is saying a lot, I see fights from all over the world).
A lot of ways...
Winning
beating line moves
betting obscure sports/ props, halves, quarters
career winner from book in question
more dogs, some on ML
parlay/ tease when advantageous
using free halves, bonuses, avoiding fees
betting at said book when they offer the best line, esp. a very large bet on the off-line
Real books don't care about this stuff !
Winning
beating line moves
betting obscure sports/ props, halves, quarters
career winner from book in question
more dogs, some on ML
parlay/ tease when advantageous
using free halves, bonuses, avoiding fees
betting at said book when they offer the best line, esp. a very large bet on the off-line
Real books don't care about this stuff !
choptalk said:
What AMAZE me is that MANY books CANT and CANT and CANT understand the difference between a "LUCKY RUN" that EVERYONE can make and a "GENUINE WINNING RUN" made by $$$ bettors.
Chop, Is Betonsports so bad? Never play with a Betonsports umbrella book ( many advertise at OSGA ), i always heard they are a giant financially but always see a bad rating at SBR. Do you mean that they use the same Betus business model? ( if you win we will say that you are a wise guy so we wil not pay you )?
Thanks
Concorde
Sometimes it will take some books longer than other books to realize they found a sharp that was beating them and beating the line consistenly. A middler will race the originator in trying to get the number first so he then can come back and bet the back side. top books never consider middlers SHARP. I seen this one guy go on along streak betting baseball and he was a cold turkey. I use to tell this bookie all the time dont worry the cream will come to the top, he blew all the money back plus in like a month. Sharp guys are defintely someone you need to focus on 7-days a week. The whole key is the book to know who are the true SHARPS. alot of books deal with some guys forever and never realize they are sharp simply because they have so many customers. I love to track a BEARD down, I play dumb with them, because I never want them to know I know. never let a player know how sharp you are, you only can hurt yourself.
Delsol. alot of players have gotten stiffed because the book found out they were SHARP. alot of truth what you are saying.
Delsol. alot of players have gotten stiffed because the book found out they were SHARP. alot of truth what you are saying.
