Article on correlated parlays

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
4,477
Tokens
The writer Jeff Haney knows less about gambling than the pope. He keeps saying "correlated parlay" are baseball +150 or more road dogs to the Over or home fav to the Under. Huh? Later in the article he disproves his own correlated parlay talk by saying +150 or more road dogs to the Over parlay is 2-22 so far this year.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
14,280
Tokens
Chuck, how does that "disprove" the correlation? Rather tiny sample size.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
4,477
Tokens
D2bets, There is no correlation what so ever in a baseball underdog winning and the game going over the total. If that was true I would be rich. As Ken White said, Las Vegas books will let you parlay side and total in the same game all day long.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
14,280
Tokens
Chuck Sims said:
D2bets, There is no correlation what so ever in a baseball underdog winning and the game going over the total. If that was true I would be rich. As Ken White said, Las Vegas books will let you parlay side and total in the same game all day long.

Re-read it again..."ROAD dogs to the over and HOME fav to the under". Not so sure the dog/fav adds (or subtracts) much, but the road/over and home/under are correlated, to an extent.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,106,770
Messages
13,438,863
Members
99,338
Latest member
chaicoca816
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com