Breaking News: to lighten up the forum.

Search

Banned
Joined
Jun 25, 2002
Messages
4,684
Tokens
Upskirt Subway Camera Causes Bomb Scare <!-- END HEADLINE -->

<!-- BEGIN STORY BODY -->Wed May 18, 7:46 PM ET



NEW YORK - A small digital camera apparently planted by an unidentified voyeur to shoot up passing skirts caused a brief bomb scare near a Manhattan subway station, police said Wednesday.<script type="text/javascript">if (window.yzq_a == null) document.write("<scr" + "ipt type=text/javascript src=""http://us.js1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/lib/bc/bc_1.7.0.js></scr" + "ipt>");</script><script type="text/javascript">if (window.yzq_a){yzq_a('p', 'P=A7yoL86.I3r0zRXjQkjWJRcKQQXeWkKMCVkABPLN&T=15qg0k51b%2fX%3d1116473689%2fE%3d89014318%2fR%3dnews%2fK%3d5%2fV%3d1.1%2fW%3ddefault%2fY%3dYAHOO%2fF%3d3580809896%2fH%3dY2FjaGVoaW50PSJuZXdzIiBjb250ZW50PSJpdDtWaWRlbzt2aWRlbyI-%2fS%3d1%2fJ%3d4C23BECE');yzq_a('a', '&U=139b1dbeq%2fN%3dMJDKwc6.Isc-%2fC%3d338523.6316468.7362872.1442997%2fD%3dLREC%2fB%3d2700852');}</script> <noscript>
b
</noscript>

A pedestrian called police on Tuesday afternoon to report seeing a box with wires sticking out of it under a subway grate in a sidewalk on the Upper East Side. The block was closed off while the police bomb squad investigated.

The scare ended when officers discovered that the device was a digital camera.

Police said on Wednesday they believe someone positioned the camera to record so-called upskirt images of women and girls in dresses and skirts as they strolled over the grate.

Investigators found no evidence that the hidden camera had taken or transmitted any of the photos, which are featured on various Web sites.

As of late Wednesday, there were no arrests.

Video voyeurism, secretly capturing images of another person for sexual purposes, became a felony in New York in 2003. The statute, Stephanie's Law, was named for a Long Island woman whose landlord spied on her for months by hiding a tiny video camera in a smoke detector above her bed.

Under the law, most video voyeurism can result in sentences ranging from one year to seven years in prison. The longest sentences apply to cases in which images are sold or traded.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
34,790
Tokens
http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2013/aug/27/man-suspected-upskirt-photography-strip-headed-tri/

Man suspected of upskirt photography on Strip headed to trial

<!-- END .story-header -->
scaled.20130819_SUN_JonasMaxwell_002_t653.jpg
Christopher DeVargas
Jonas Maxwell appears before Judge Eric Goodman at the Regional Justice Center on Monday, Aug. 19, 2013.

<!-- END #leadPhoto --> By <cite>Bethany Barnes</cite> (contact)
Tuesday, Aug. 27, 2013 | 10:58 a.m.
Jonas Maxwell

scaled.20130819_SUN_JonasMaxwell_002_t320.jpg
Launch slideshow »
<!-- END .slideshow-block -->
<!-- END .inline-content -->
<!-- END .inline .inline-slideshow .inline-right #slideshow_inline_0819_jonas_maxwell --> After 11 months in limbo, being begrudgingly put on house arrest and a brief stint in jail, a Las Vegas man now has a date in court on charges he tried to take upskirt photos of women on the Strip.


Jonas Maxwell, 56, is charged in Las Vegas Township Justice Court with three misdemeanor counts of attempt to capture an image of a private area of another person. A bench trial in front of Judge Eric Goodman is set for 9 a.m. Oct. 7.
The case has been unusual from the start.
Maxwell was arrested in September 2012 but wasn’t charged until Wednesday because the Clark County District Attorney’s Office was awaiting results from a forensics lab. Prosecutors kept going to court to ask for more time to officially file charges against Maxwell.
In July, Maxwell attended one of the hearings and immediately crossed Goodman. Maxwell had been arrested again in April for taking upskirt photos, and Goodman wanted him to stop putting himself at risk of additional arrests. Maxwell couldn’t assure Goodman that wouldn’t happen, so the judge put him under house arrest.
Maxwell’s public defender, Robert O’Brien, argued the judge overstepped his authority by ordering the house arrest since Maxwell hadn’t been charged with a crime.
O’Brien further argued that the house arrest put Maxwell at a financial disadvantage. House arrest costs $100 upfront and $12 a day thereafter. Most people on house arrest ask to be placed there because they don't want to be in jail. That wasn’t the case with Maxwell.
The legal battle intensified when Maxwell went to lunch at the Palms, violating provisions of the house arrest order. The violation landed him in the Clark County Detention Center. There, authorities wanted him to sign new house arrest paperwork, but Maxwell wouldn’t because of his “libertarian mindset,” O’Brien said.
O’Brien pleaded with Goodman to cut Maxwell loose, arguing that Maxwell hadn’t been charged with a crime and shouldn’t be under house arrest, let alone in jail. Goodman wouldn’t budge.
Maxwell was in jail because of his own stubbornness, Goodman contended.
A few days after Goodman ruled Maxwell would have to sign or sit in jail, prosecutors filed charges and Maxwell signed the paperwork.
Now, Maxwell is under house arrest with orders to stay away from casinos, computers and phones with camera capabilities.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,514
Messages
13,452,095
Members
99,417
Latest member
selectionpartners
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com