This past Friday morning, I came up with an idea for somewhat of a system. I came home and spent a couple of hours reviewing some numbers and trends. I know this (somewhat of a) system probably breaks a few capping rules, but I thought I'd at least try it out. Please don't hammer me too bad, since I'm not a capper by any means.
Not to get too detailed, I am not looking to ever fork over any juice. I figure if I hit at least 50% and play units properly, I should be in the plus over the long haul.
I've mainly been tailing ego and bucsfan the last couple weeks, and have enjoyed their success. There are many great cappers on this site and I plan to continue tailing these guys. I am decreasing my unit size for my own system just to try it out. I've played it on Friday and Saturday and came out
4 - 3 (+4.35 units).
I won't count these as official plays since I didn't post them. Anyhow, here it goes and wish me luck.
Baltimore (-1.5) +145 2 *
Dodgers (-1.5) +140 1 *
Pittsburg (-1.5) +150 1 *
Parlay :
St. Louis (W) -192
Minnesota (W) -230 +118 2 *
Parlay
St. Louis (-1.5) -135
Minnesota (-1.5) -115) *225 1 *
BTW : This system is highly based on runlines(which is a no no, but oh well):think:
Not to get too detailed, I am not looking to ever fork over any juice. I figure if I hit at least 50% and play units properly, I should be in the plus over the long haul.
I've mainly been tailing ego and bucsfan the last couple weeks, and have enjoyed their success. There are many great cappers on this site and I plan to continue tailing these guys. I am decreasing my unit size for my own system just to try it out. I've played it on Friday and Saturday and came out
4 - 3 (+4.35 units).
I won't count these as official plays since I didn't post them. Anyhow, here it goes and wish me luck.
Baltimore (-1.5) +145 2 *
Dodgers (-1.5) +140 1 *
Pittsburg (-1.5) +150 1 *
Parlay :
St. Louis (W) -192
Minnesota (W) -230 +118 2 *
Parlay
St. Louis (-1.5) -135
Minnesota (-1.5) -115) *225 1 *
BTW : This system is highly based on runlines(which is a no no, but oh well):think: