Yes. I subscribe to them for the football season.
They give out a ton of information and selections on the NFL.
For the 2004 season they had a winning percentage of 56.1% for what I used them for. This was for the period from the start of the season to the Super Bowl. Their "best bets" are very good but so are many other categories of selections that they have.
Their subscription service is very reasonable in price.
Many in this forum would not pay for any service as they think they can do a better job themselves or they rely on selections given free from this forum. I can understand if someone is willing to spend the time to do an analysis on all the sides and totals. I just do not have the time to do that.
However, if I can find a service that is low cost and is a reliable "proven" winner I would use them.
I certainly will use them again in 2005.
Just my opinion.
They give out a ton of information and selections on the NFL.
For the 2004 season they had a winning percentage of 56.1% for what I used them for. This was for the period from the start of the season to the Super Bowl. Their "best bets" are very good but so are many other categories of selections that they have.
Their subscription service is very reasonable in price.
Many in this forum would not pay for any service as they think they can do a better job themselves or they rely on selections given free from this forum. I can understand if someone is willing to spend the time to do an analysis on all the sides and totals. I just do not have the time to do that.
However, if I can find a service that is low cost and is a reliable "proven" winner I would use them.
I certainly will use them again in 2005.
Just my opinion.
They are what you said they are, TOOLS, just like skill-saws, disc cutters, etc, and as you know, people buy them and havent a clue how to use them. Although I dont subscribe, I do find their website informative, however, its all in the eye of the beholder and interpretation. I see The Bengals are listed as the No1 CB shut-down tandem, which has obviously come about because teams constantly ran on them, only going to the long pass when behind and desperate.
