Journeyman said:
I might disagree with you here JMan...I've got a friend who uses a service and they have been incredible to say the least. They only charge commission on the winnings. You only pay for weeks you make money. They hit 61% in the NBA for him this year and he keeps very detailed records. He tells me they hit 59% in the NFL and 62% in NCAA football last year for him.
I don't know if I've seen better than that anywhere.
He was about a 1-2 dime a game player before he signed up with them and now he plays about 5 dimes a game. I have considered trying it out but I can't stand the thought of using someone elses plays and losing. I would go nuts.
There are so many very good pro's that keep a very low profile and are consistant winners year in year out. The key too winning is information. BW is the King of info. He does not handicap. He pays guys too do that for him, fires them alot also. You guys can praise BW all you want, but without his info that he pays for he is a degenrate just like the rest of you. He got very lucky, took advantage of a situation many years ago and has become a very wealthy man because of it. I respect what he did and how he did it. Truly amazing. 
You'll NEVER hear me praise BW, Drunk. But I do respect him and his network! (Still a scumbag in my book!):sad3:drunk said:There are so many very good pro's that keep a very low profile and are consistant winners year in year out. The key too winning is information. BW is the King of info. He does not handicap. He pays guys too do that for him, fires them alot also. You guys can praise BW all you want, but without his info that he pays for he is a degenrate just like the rest of you. He got very lucky, took advantage of a situation many years ago and has become a very wealthy man because of it. I respect what he did and how he did it. Truly amazing.
miked429 said:
Based on this past spring, you have a strong case, but wasn't he off his game the year or two prior?
I think it depends on the particuliar sport amongst other variables(solo, group, backers, BM, board play, spot play, sides, totals, scalps, series/futures, specialist, generalist, originator, follower,etc..)
Different type wars require different type nomenclatures!
Journeyman said:
Absolutely not. LIke I said information Sir. And I am not ashamed too admit it. Although if I put in the many hours I know the variables behind successful handicapping. I know what a 1/2 popint is worth on every number, I know how many cents a 1/2 run is worth in bases...etc..Without naming names..there are alot of so called"experts" who names are bowed down too on these boards that are all just information guys. It's a team effort.
