Remember--New law entitles you to receive 3 FREE Credit Reports a year!

Search

Active member
Joined
Oct 20, 1999
Messages
75,444
Tokens
It would be silly not to take advantage of this!

You may get ONE FREE from each of the TOP THREE credit agencies, so my advice would be to spread your three free reports over the course of a years time..........perhaps getting one free every 3-4 months or so.

The following is a link that is all you will need to get your free credit reports..........

https://www.annualcreditreport.com/cra/index.jsp
 
Last edited:

New member
Joined
Oct 3, 2004
Messages
3,741
Tokens
That's nice...."the free part"..is what I'm referring to. But I'm not sure about getting 3 reports ...if that would trigger another negatve reaction to a potential lender..
Anymore...After today's Supreme Court Decision...I don't know nothing about nothin..
 

Rx Post Doc
Joined
Feb 8, 2005
Messages
12,805
Tokens
I know for a fact that you reviewing your credit report using the 'free' reports from each company will not cause a 'ping' on your report that indicates a movement to carry more debt on the part of the consumer. It is not treated that way.

Fish has a great idea. Get one of the free reports every four months, spreading your monitoring out over the year. Great idea.

However, today's decision by the Supreme Court regarding private property makes me wonder too and I am most concerned about the direction the decision indicates we are going. tulsa
 

Active member
Joined
Oct 20, 1999
Messages
75,444
Tokens
Tulsa said:
I know for a fact that you reviewing your credit report using the 'free' reports from each company will not cause a 'ping' on your report that indicates a movement to carry more debt on the part of the consumer. It is not treated that way.

Fish has a great idea. Get one of the free reports every four months, spreading your monitoring out over the year. Great idea.

However, today's decision by the Supreme Court regarding private property makes me wonder too and I am most concerned about the direction the decision indicates we are going. tulsa

What decision was that?
 

Rx Post Doc
Joined
Feb 8, 2005
Messages
12,805
Tokens
The supreme court ruled that municipalities can seize property from private owners (at fair market price) and give control and ownership of the property to OTHER PRIVATE interests for (not highways or schools or other public works) convention center 'revitalization' projects etc. which also, by the way, increases tax revenue for the city from the increased value of the property and from retail sales. tulsa

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=877474
 

International Playa
Joined
Dec 15, 2003
Messages
10,183
Tokens
this happened about an hour from me, crazy! Isn't a court supposed to enforce the laws, not make them up?
 

New member
Joined
Oct 3, 2004
Messages
3,741
Tokens
Sherman? Is that Connecticut woman of 80 something years old actually going to LOSE her home to some private developer? I am STILL IN TOTALSHOCK ABOUT THIS!

This is BIG BROTHER AT HIS WORSE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,106,813
Messages
13,439,068
Members
99,339
Latest member
billcunninghamhomeloans
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com