Cris pisses me off!

Search

Rx God
Joined
Nov 1, 2002
Messages
39,226
Tokens
I wanted about $50 on AZ over 4.5 -115 team total and fucked it up. I bet 63/54. It should cost $62.1 risk. It's my fault. Why can't a fucking top book have better software. I didn't want 115/100 since I have other bets on game, I just wanted a little.

They're like a fucking bank nickel and diming you for change ! I bet it adds up to a nice sum daily.

betting 57.50/ 50 should be doable when a line ends in a 5. The only thing that pisses me off more is the WSEX style.
 

LA Clippers Junkie
Joined
May 14, 2005
Messages
11,323
Tokens
A lot of negative posts about CRIS lately...they sure seem to have fallen pretty far.
 

Rx God
Joined
Nov 1, 2002
Messages
39,226
Tokens
I have no qualms about getting paid there, but this is intentionally engineered to rip you off. I can't bet $50 without getting ripped off.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
8,951
Tokens
DougJ said:
I wanted about $50 on AZ over 4.5 -115 team total and fucked it up. I bet 63/54. It should cost $62.1 risk. It's my fault. Why can't a fucking top book have better software. I didn't want 115/100 since I have other bets on game, I just wanted a little.

They're like a fucking bank nickel and diming you for change ! I bet it adds up to a nice sum daily.

betting 57.50/ 50 should be doable when a line ends in a 5. The only thing that pisses me off more is the WSEX style.
What was their response when you called them?
 

Rx God
Joined
Nov 1, 2002
Messages
39,226
Tokens
I didn't call them, I screwed up the bet amount all by myself, I should have bet an amount to get ripped off for like 10 cents, not 90 cents.
 

Active member
Joined
Oct 20, 1999
Messages
75,444
Tokens
Unfortunately there are more than a handful of sportsbook that do this.


:sad3:
 

Rx God
Joined
Nov 1, 2002
Messages
39,226
Tokens
52 risk for 45 pay-off would have been better ( should be $45.21). It's a principle thing.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
8,951
Tokens
DougJ said:
I didn't call them, I screwed up the bet amount all by myself, I should have bet an amount to get ripped off for like 10 cents, not 90 cents.
No offense Doug, but I would think they deserve a phone call before posting a negative thread here on the Rx. But that's probably just me, I was in the business too long I guess for today's hi-tech world. Most guys here would probably bash first and call later, if ever!:sad3:
 

Rx God
Joined
Nov 1, 2002
Messages
39,226
Tokens
I ain't calling them over this petty shit, they do it on purpose.
 

International Playa
Joined
Dec 15, 2003
Messages
10,183
Tokens
CAPN CRUNCH said:
No offense Doug, but I would think they deserve a phone call before posting a negative thread here on the Rx. But that's probably just me, I was in the business too long I guess for today's hi-tech world. Most guys here would probably bash first and call later, if ever!:sad3:

what's a phone call going to do?
 

Rx God
Joined
Nov 1, 2002
Messages
39,226
Tokens
sherman said:
what's a phone call going to do?

exactly it's the software. They would probably credit me $1 after 15 minutes on the phone.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
8,951
Tokens
Sherman: Maybe just a heads-up, I am not speaking for CRIS, but to me it gives them a chance to 'defend' themselves beforethefact. What could it hurt to call them. Hey, they may say "f*** off!", but then you'd have a better post I would think!:toast:
 

Fox

New member
Joined
May 20, 2005
Messages
68
Tokens
They are too big to fall, trust me, they will always be there, you gotta remember credit guys don't care about this, and CRIS is mostly Credit...they are not going to change anything
 

Rx God
Joined
Nov 1, 2002
Messages
39,226
Tokens
agree, safety is not a concern with CRIS, if that was in question I'd never play there.
 

International Playa
Joined
Dec 15, 2003
Messages
10,183
Tokens
CAPN CRUNCH said:
Sherman: Maybe just a heads-up, I am not speaking for CRIS, but to me it gives them a chance to 'defend' themselves beforethefact. What could it hurt to call them. Hey, they may say "f*** off!", but then you'd have a better post I would think!:toast:

nothing really to defend themselves about, it clearly states what your wager is before you confirm it.....so it's "ok" they do it, doug just doesn't agree with the practice.....
 

New member
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
8,951
Tokens
sherman said:
nothing really to defend themselves about, it clearly states what your wager is before you confirm it.....so it's "ok" they do it, doug just doesn't agree with the practice.....
Actually , I was talking about a preemptive outcome before they receive negative publicity on the Rx. Just seems right to me , but maybe I'm old fashioned! Either way, have a good night and good luck on the game!:drink:
 

New member
Joined
Sep 24, 2004
Messages
943
Tokens
WSEX was the worst. I don't know if they changed it or not but back then, you can input your own specific amount. You had to choose from one of their amounts which is ridiculous.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 24, 2004
Messages
943
Tokens
pokerpills said:
WSEX was the worst. I don't know if they changed it or not but back then, you can input your own specific amount. You had to choose from one of their amounts which is ridiculous.


correction: "you can't input your own amount" .
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,106,770
Messages
13,438,857
Members
99,338
Latest member
chaicoca816
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com