Very Famous Case Out Of Canada In June 2005

Search

ODU GURU
Joined
Feb 26, 1999
Messages
20,881
Tokens
Expert bolsters Grewal tape altering charges

<SCRIPT language=javascript type=text/javascript> var byString = ""; var sourceString = "CTV.ca News Staff"; if ((sourceString != "") && (byString != "")) { document.write(byString + ", "); } else { document.write(byString); } </SCRIPT>CTV.ca News Staff

One of Canada's top audio experts says a segment of a taped conversation between Conservative MP Gurmant Grewal and a Liberal appears to have been altered, a claim that bolsters charges of tampering.

Meanwhile, Grewal continues to deny the allegations.

After analyzing a 46-second segment of recordings of Grewal speaking with Health Minister Ujjal Dosanjh, audio expert Steven Pausak said Thursday that there appears to be a break in one of the tapes.

"It appears to be altered," Pausak said, after examining the segment at the request of The Canadian Press.

"This brief segment at the beginning shows that it's not continuous, and it should be."

The Conservative Party said late Thursday that small gaps occurred when the master tapes were transferred to CD.

But Pausak said he found an entirely separate abnormality that couldn't be explained by transferring.

Pausak, who once worked for the Ontario government and now testifies in trials, said there is a discontinuity in the audio file.

"I'm talking about alteration. I am trying to avoid the word tampering,'' he said.

"When you are using the word 'tampering', that means intent, right? Most of the time there is no way to show intent through the examination of the recording. You just see that it's altered.''

Grewal denied tampering with the evidence.

Earlier in the day, Dosanjh urged MPs not to trust the audiotapes released by Grewal earlier this week, alleging they had been doctored.

"I said yesterday that not much stock should be placed in those tapes, my suspicions have come true, independent experts from (Ottawa radio station) CFRA have said the tapes have been doctored," Dosanjh said during Thursday's question period, referring to producers at the radio station.

While Grewal said there were up to four hours of audiotapes, materials covering only about 90 minutes were released.

"He has now actually missed some of the tapes, he's missed the tape of a two-hour conversation with me in my home," Dosanjh said.

Martin turns tables

Prime Minister Paul Martin said the allegations raise questions that the Conservatives must answer.

"The allegations in terms of the tapes -- the tapes have been doctored and this kind of thing -- I think are actually very, very disturbing," he said.

"And I think the questions really should be put to Mr. Harper and Mr. Grewal."

Grewal alleges he and his wife were offered plum posts in exchange for their support in the crucial budget vote.

However, Dosanjh and Martin's chief of staff Tim Murphy deny any wrongdoing and say Grewal approached them.

Tapes dominate QP

Meanwhile, the Liberals and Opposition continued to butt heads over the tapes during question period.

"Does the prime minister still deny that his health minister and chief of staff were making a deal on his behalf?" Conservative Deputy Leader Peter MacKay asked.

But Deputy Prime Minister Anne McLellan maintained the position of the Liberal party.

"The prime minister was absolutely clear in relation to what he told Mr. Murphy, he told Mr. Murphy 'Do not make an offer' and, Mr. Speaker, no offer was made," she said.

On Wednesday, there was confusion over the exact nature of the RCMP probe.

"We are looking into the allegations of what happened and what everyone is talking about if, in fact, a criminal act happened," RCMP Cpl. Nathalie Deschenes told CTV News.

Later, the Prime Minister's Office asked CTV to call RCMP Chief Superintendent Bernie Corrigan, who contradicted Cpl. Deschenes' statement. He said there was no criminal investigation at this point, but the Mounties are considering a formal request from the Bloc Quebecois for an inquiry.

"How did they know in the PMO, and can the prime minister tell us when his communications department became the official spokesperson for the RCMP?" MacKay asked on Thursday.

"Let me make it absolutely clear: No one from the Prime Minister's Office contacted anyone from the RCMP," McLellan responded.

The Conservatives are saying that "it left the impression that the Prime Minister's Office might have been meddling in this," CTV's Rosemary Thompson reported from Ottawa.

"Now, speaking to the official at the PMO, they are very adamant, saying they never spoke to the RCMP. This of course would be very serious for the Prime Minister's Office to be engaging in any kind of influence of a police investigation, adamantly they are saying over and over again they never spoke to the RCMP."
 

New member
Joined
Oct 3, 2004
Messages
3,741
Tokens
THE SHRINK said:
Expert bolsters Grewal tape altering charges

<SCRIPT language=javascript type=text/javascript> var byString = ""; var sourceString = "CTV.ca News Staff"; if ((sourceString != "") && (byString != "")) { document.write(byString + ", "); } else { document.write(byString); } </SCRIPT>CTV.ca News Staff

One of Canada's top audio experts says a segment of a taped conversation between Conservative MP Gurmant Grewal and a Liberal appears to have been altered, a claim that bolsters charges of tampering.

Meanwhile, Grewal continues to deny the allegations.

After analyzing a 46-second segment of recordings of Grewal speaking with Health Minister Ujjal Dosanjh, audio expert Steven Pausak said Thursday that there appears to be a break in one of the tapes.

"It appears to be altered," Pausak said, after examining the segment at the request of The Canadian Press.

"This brief segment at the beginning shows that it's not continuous, and it should be."

The Conservative Party said late Thursday that small gaps occurred when the master tapes were transferred to CD.

But Pausak said he found an entirely separate abnormality that couldn't be explained by transferring.

Pausak, who once worked for the Ontario government and now testifies in trials, said there is a discontinuity in the audio file.

"I'm talking about alteration. I am trying to avoid the word tampering,'' he said.

"When you are using the word 'tampering', that means intent, right? Most of the time there is no way to show intent through the examination of the recording. You just see that it's altered.''

Grewal denied tampering with the evidence.

Earlier in the day, Dosanjh urged MPs not to trust the audiotapes released by Grewal earlier this week, alleging they had been doctored.

"I said yesterday that not much stock should be placed in those tapes, my suspicions have come true, independent experts from (Ottawa radio station) CFRA have said the tapes have been doctored," Dosanjh said during Thursday's question period, referring to producers at the radio station.

While Grewal said there were up to four hours of audiotapes, materials covering only about 90 minutes were released.

"He has now actually missed some of the tapes, he's missed the tape of a two-hour conversation with me in my home," Dosanjh said.

Martin turns tables

Prime Minister Paul Martin said the allegations raise questions that the Conservatives must answer.

"The allegations in terms of the tapes -- the tapes have been doctored and this kind of thing -- I think are actually very, very disturbing," he said.

"And I think the questions really should be put to Mr. Harper and Mr. Grewal."

Grewal alleges he and his wife were offered plum posts in exchange for their support in the crucial budget vote.

However, Dosanjh and Martin's chief of staff Tim Murphy deny any wrongdoing and say Grewal approached them.

Tapes dominate QP

Meanwhile, the Liberals and Opposition continued to butt heads over the tapes during question period.

"Does the prime minister still deny that his health minister and chief of staff were making a deal on his behalf?" Conservative Deputy Leader Peter MacKay asked.

But Deputy Prime Minister Anne McLellan maintained the position of the Liberal party.

"The prime minister was absolutely clear in relation to what he told Mr. Murphy, he told Mr. Murphy 'Do not make an offer' and, Mr. Speaker, no offer was made," she said.

On Wednesday, there was confusion over the exact nature of the RCMP probe.

"We are looking into the allegations of what happened and what everyone is talking about if, in fact, a criminal act happened," RCMP Cpl. Nathalie Deschenes told CTV News.

Later, the Prime Minister's Office asked CTV to call RCMP Chief Superintendent Bernie Corrigan, who contradicted Cpl. Deschenes' statement. He said there was no criminal investigation at this point, but the Mounties are considering a formal request from the Bloc Quebecois for an inquiry.

"How did they know in the PMO, and can the prime minister tell us when his communications department became the official spokesperson for the RCMP?" MacKay asked on Thursday.

"Let me make it absolutely clear: No one from the Prime Minister's Office contacted anyone from the RCMP," McLellan responded.

The Conservatives are saying that "it left the impression that the Prime Minister's Office might have been meddling in this," CTV's Rosemary Thompson reported from Ottawa.

"Now, speaking to the official at the PMO, they are very adamant, saying they never spoke to the RCMP. This of course would be very serious for the Prime Minister's Office to be engaging in any kind of influence of a police investigation, adamantly they are saying over and over again they never spoke to the RCMP."

Who is simply amazed. :monsters-
 

ODU GURU
Joined
Feb 26, 1999
Messages
20,881
Tokens
Makers,

Please don't embarrass the average IQ of this forum. The entire point of this thread is to bring to light the fact that audio tapes can be altered...

I have asked Royal Sports to send an independent Forensic Voice Specialist obtained by Legal Counsel the original tape(s) and thus far, ROYAL has failed to provide the tapes...

Russie poo would have you believe that voice recognition alone should be sufficient evidence to clear Royal, but I am suggesting quite the opposite...

Personally, I would have sent the tapes OVERNIGHT had my reputation been on the line and I KNEW that the tapes would exonerate me...

THE SHRINK
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
439
Tokens
Ken, Dave was talking to his wife in the backgorund at the end of tape 1. Do you think they made that up as well? Perhaps they went and bugged his house to get her voice as well?

You have heard the mans voice on the phone as have I. You know that is the man. If you are saying that they took his voice from previoustapes, altered it to say things he didnt say in some kind of elaberate scheme, then I think you have been Robertoized.

Ken with all due respect. IMO you should stop the silliness. You got played by Roberto. You know this is the guys voice as well as I do.

Whats next. He actually sent 200k?

You make a poost comparing a bet to a top level government scandal?

Give it up.

Happy Holiday BTW

Russ
 

ODU GURU
Joined
Feb 26, 1999
Messages
20,881
Tokens
Russ,

I was INTENDING to give it up so that the PLAYER MIGHT get paid, yet you continue to call me an "EXTORTIONIST" once again THIS MORNING on your forum.

Hell, I don't even have the ability to DEFEND myself over there from your slanderous comments because you BANNED me!!!

If you REALLY want me to "give it up," then I suggest you do likewise...

I can list a whole lot of NEW FACTS that I have deliberately ommitted which are pertinent to this case if you persist...

The ball is now in your court....

Happy Holdays To You too,

Ken
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
439
Tokens
Ken, I banned you because you knew I was away and you and your sidekick decided that was a good time to start this campaign. You were told at the time that was going to happen after you promised to stop with the crap and didnt. Tough to babysit you two from an airplane.

If you think these tapes were made up on Sunday with some sort of CIA equipment then thats your choice.

You are free to post as many facts and ommissions here.

I have a feeling you are doing all this to grab as many people to your new site. It is the only thing that makes any possible sense.

Maybe the management here falls for that garbage.

I dont.

Prime Minister of Canada Ken?

Are you stoned?
 

TOW

No gossip, just news
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
744
Tokens
Russ, you posted this comment:

It is his voice. He is saying it was doctored. At least thats what Roberto told me on IM. Not sure what was doctored.

Soon a martian ship will be landing.

I guess you believe Martians have been involved in the Grewal case as well :toast:

Jokes apart...

Yes Ken spoke to the player;

Yes I have spoken to the player SEVERAL times;

As a matter of fact you are the only one who hasn't spoken to the player by your own admission. General tried to facilitate a three way call but you were busy and hung up...the player asked you to call him and you didn't....

I respect your opinion but, for your own admission, your position is solely based on the book's position, better on the "longer dick" stunt you posted yesterday..."if Royal doesn't renege the deal I pulled their banners off MW"...

So you haven't spoken to the player, you haven't heard his side of the story but you have bullied Royal into reneging a deal in favor of a PLAYER.

That's kind of you...

All I am saying is that the player denies having made those calls. Modern technology allows tapes to be tampered with in such a sophisticated way that only an EXPERT can detect if a tape has been forged or not.

Hence my stance to have those tapes audited stands. Royal initially agreed, the player agrees...everyone involved in the solution of this dispute agrees but you.

therefore my question to you is as simple as it could be...why ?
 

"American Idol Capping Expert"
Joined
Jul 20, 2001
Messages
7,591
Tokens
Ken - let's hope Major comes back and permits you to post at HIS forum.




:103631605
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
439
Tokens
Roberto, I spoke to the player twice. And he left a message on my voicemail.

Do you ever get any facts straight?

Your anti Royal campaign all because Tej stopped paying you hush money is sickening at best.

I am gone for the weekend.
 

New member
Joined
Jul 20, 2002
Messages
75,154
Tokens
Maybe the management here falls for that garbage.



I take offense to that Russ, The Rx. is fine with letting everyone express their views or opinions regarding this situation, including yourself. However that in no ways means we are falling for any garbage, your's or anyone elses.




wilheim
 

ODU GURU
Joined
Feb 26, 1999
Messages
20,881
Tokens
Russ,

I suggest you speak with ROYAL before you invite me to post more facts. If they ok it, then I will post more...

Also, regarding the royal/player dispute threads, no one has mentioned anything about my new site except YOU...

Thanks for the free plug, but we really don't need it...

You are resorting to SPINNING this all around and it makes your argument feeble..

THE SHRINK
 

New member
Joined
Oct 15, 2004
Messages
1,839
Tokens
Shrink,
You said in the Royal open letter thread, that if Royal had tapes of this player making the 20K bets, that your position vis a vis Royal paying this player would be different. Presumably, by different you mean you would not agree with Royal paying that player. OK, so now we have the tapes and even though your opinion has been requested, you have not offered it. I'm going to make this real easy for you since you obviously have trouble doing, even knowing, the right thing. You should announce right now that Royal should not pay this player unless it is proved that he did not make the 20K bets. These tapes should be sent to an audio expert and if proven that they are not the voice of this David W., then Royal should pay that expense. If they are indeed the accurate tapes of bets made by David W., then you should pay the expense of the audio analysis.

Audiotapes of player bets are the standard of business in the offshore industry. For you to say that these tapes are not enough now for an offshore sportsbook to justify grading a bet; now the standard is that any disputed tapes must be sent to an audio expert; well that puts an undue strain on the whole industry. There must be literally millions of bets recorded every year by offshore sportsbooks; so now, thanks to the Shrink, any player can dispute that he made the bet and the Shrink will blindly accept the players side, especially when the Shrink has an agenda against that sportsbook. If you are wrong about this, Shrink, you have done a great disservice to the offshore industry; all books should avoid you like the plague. If you are right, I will be the first to apologise!
 

TOW

No gossip, just news
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
744
Tokens
Russ,

I must admit you're a spin master :toast:

Keep up the good work..and good weekend to you to my friend.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
233
Tokens
Please don't embarrass the average IQ of this forum.

With all due respect I can't imagine anyone close to an average IQ not knowing tapes can be altered...

A side note one has to wonder how many legit threads and replies there are when subtracting those with agendas. Kudos for the player being paid, as far as the rest?
 

ODU GURU
Joined
Feb 26, 1999
Messages
20,881
Tokens
doug,

You are spinning my words too and your agenda is so obvious. All you ever post about lately is how righteous Royal is...

All I wanted from the start are the tapes to be examined by an independent third party expert. Royal has failed to provide them to the expert we agreed upon...

Let me ask you some questions since you seem so interested...

1-Why do you care so much about ROYAL?

2-Do you believe this Player is Lying and if so, how can you be so sure?

3-Have you ever spoken to the player to hear HIS SIDE?

4-Do you even care to hear the Player's side?

5-Do you think the method of continuous slow pays by ROYAL is an industry standard?

6-Are you aware the SBR is reporting this?

<TABLE borderColor=#ffffff cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=0 bgColor=#ffffff border=1><TBODY><TR><TD class=mainbox>
7.1.2005 (10:11 AM CST)



</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>SBR Bill Dozer reports: Royal Sports (SBR rating D-) agrees to pay slow-paid player, concluding high-profile dispute. SBR has recently received three additional payout complaints, two of which are currently pending. SBR to report on the status of these withdrawals.

7-What do you make about this new report by SBR?

Thanks for you time,

THE SHRINK

Makers,

Player had not been paid a penny yet...
 

New member
Joined
Oct 15, 2004
Messages
1,839
Tokens
THE SHRINK said:
doug,

You are spinning my words too and your agenda is so obvious. All you ever post about lately is how righteous Royal is...

(You are correct, Shrink, I have an agenda, ie. that both Royal and the player be treated fairly. I do not think it is fair that Royal should pay the player 20K if he lost those 20K bets.)

All I wanted from the start are the tapes to be examined by an independent third party expert. Royal has failed to provide them to the expert we agreed upon...

(I agree, Royal should send the tapes to be examined by the agreed upon expert)

Let me ask you some questions since you seem so interested...

1-Why do you care so much about ROYAL?

(see my agenda above)

2-Do you believe this Player is Lying and if so, how can you be so sure?

(I don't know. But from his own story posted here, he says he deposited 60K; he ran that up to 200K; asked for withdrawls of 50K; and bet and lost the other 150K while waiting for that 50K. So I don't find it hard to believe that this same player would redeposit the 20K withdrawn funds which he had not already received, and bet that 20K. And if he did redeposit that 20K in his Royal account and lose the bets, then he is certainly not entitled to receive the 20K. Do you disagree with that, Shrink? Can any reasonable person disagree with that?)

3-Have you ever spoken to the player to hear HIS SIDE?

(NO, of course not. I have read his side in this forum)

4-Do you even care to hear the Player's side?

(YES, of course)

5-Do you think the method of continuous slow pays by ROYAL is an industry standard?

(NO, but just because Royal is wrong about slow paying a player, they should not be extorted into paying a player 20K when they don't owe that player 20K)

6-Are you aware the SBR is reporting this?

(I am now)

<TABLE borderColor=#ffffff cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=0 bgColor=#ffffff border=1><TBODY><TR><TD class=mainbox>
7.1.2005 (10:11 AM CST)



</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>SBR Bill Dozer reports: Royal Sports (SBR rating D-) agrees to pay slow-paid player, concluding high-profile dispute. SBR has recently received three additional payout complaints, two of which are currently pending. SBR to report on the status of these withdrawals.

7-What do you make about this new report by SBR?

(Any number of wrongs committed by Royal does not mean that you should extort them into paying 20K to a player who is not owed 20K)

Thanks for you time, (You're welcome)

THE SHRINK

Makers,

Player had not been paid a penny yet...

Good, i hope Royal doesn't pay him unless it is proven that he did not make those 20K bets.
 

ODU GURU
Joined
Feb 26, 1999
Messages
20,881
Tokens
Doug,

Thanks for expressing a genuine interest in hearing the PLAYERS SIDE to the story. That's already MUCH MORE than RUSS has done...

I find it simply astonishing that RUSS has failed to HEAR the other side, since he tries to respresent himself as being FAIR...

There are always TWO sides to every story, then there's THE TRUTH...

Well, if you don't listen to each side, shame on you!

Please feel free to email me (aw222@aol.com) and I will arrange for this to happen...

Best wishes,

THE SHRINK
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,276
Messages
13,450,173
Members
99,404
Latest member
byen17188
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com