Nats @ Phils

winkyduck · Jul 8, 2005

can someone please tell me how Philly can be around -150 over ANYONE the way they are playing these days?

In this one - took the Nats +138 (Skybook) because I don't know how Philly is this big a fave over anyone - and NO WAY am I gonna pass up the Nats at THIS price

ppeter · Jul 8, 2005

both offenses are PATHETIC. Take a look at their most recent offensive "outputs." Under is the way to go.

CHOPTALK · Jul 8, 2005

Dreese has been great for Washington, and Tejada has not had his rookie get shelled game yet thats bound to happen any start now. :103631605

SHACK · Jul 8, 2005

Dreese's last outing at Philly cost him his job. Rangers cut him after he got shelled at Philly last month.

CHOPTALK · Jul 8, 2005

SHACK said:
Dreese's last outing at Philly cost him his job. Rangers cut him after he got shelled at Philly last month.

That was during the 1 stretch of the season that Philly was hot. They have been stone cold ever sence.

SHACK · Jul 8, 2005

Chop - I agree, and Dreese was horrible on the road then, but he is 50/50 on the road lately. Just think the line is probably right. I'm not on either side that's for sure.

SureGuy · Jul 8, 2005

winkyduck said:
can someone please tell me how Philly can be around -150 over ANYONE the way they are playing these days?

In this one - took the Nats +138 (Skybook) because I don't know how Philly is this big a fave over anyone - and NO WAY am I gonna pass up the Nats at THIS price

If the line was set that when you see it you say there is no way your taking philly, kind of says something about the line. I smell a philly blow out.

Check out Drese's last start for Texas. You might re-consider.