Why do we not hear to much about the 2005 WSOP winner..like we did with Moneymaker

Search

Active member
Joined
Jun 20, 2000
Messages
71,780
Tokens
IMO, it is because MONEYMAKER was more marketable...his name alone was good for Pokerstars


any thoughts on this??
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
298
Tokens
Maybe its because it has yet to air on Tv. Only true poker heads like us know the results ! :103631605



Dshotda1
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,447
Tokens
the first reason is that it wasnt on TV yet. Moneymaker didnt become a household name until ESPN televised the event.

Even when it is on TV Hachem is foreign, so the american public may not connect with him like they did moneymaker. And moneymaker just looked the part of the average american guy with hopes to win the big one. hachem an australian, born in lebanon, will not inspire many average joe americans.
 

RX Senior
Joined
Apr 20, 2002
Messages
47,431
Tokens
Plus he is Aussie


Nothing against that of course, just wont generate nearly the same hype as an American winner from poker stars
 

Active member
Joined
Oct 20, 1999
Messages
75,444
Tokens
Good answers thus far, all correct........


1. Not on Tv yet
2. He is an Aussie
3. Not a marketable name
4. Did not gain entry through an online site
 

RX Senior
Joined
Apr 20, 2002
Messages
47,431
Tokens
And he didnt tip the dealer either :icon_conf


Not the type of stuff fan favorites are made of
 

New member
Joined
Feb 4, 2003
Messages
3,271
Tokens
i think it has mostly to do with that Moneymaker was the 1st "non-pro", and the first to qualifiy online

It was "news" then, it is old hat now
 

Active member
Joined
Oct 20, 1999
Messages
75,444
Tokens
drunkguy said:
i think it has mostly to do with that Moneymaker was the 1st "non-pro", and the first to qualifiy online

It was "news" then, it is old hat now

Yep!

Agree, that and the saturation of poker to the general public is much more now then 2 years ago.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
407
Tokens
2% of the entry fees went to the tournament staff so that would amount to over $1,000,000 in tips without any tipping from the players directly.
 

Rx. Senior
Joined
May 20, 2001
Messages
15,046
Tokens
One of the main reason that we dont hear too much about it is because everyone is too busy playing poker themselves to worry about that!

And he is not from America so that will hurt interest as well
 

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
1,450
Tokens
Guys, there is only one reason...

Not on TV yet.

THats it. Now all the other reasons given might be reasons why after they televise it the aussie doesnt get the recognition. 95% of the people who care about poker aren't big ners like us who sit at their computers and reaqd threads on updated chip stacks at the WSOP.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
7,948
Tokens
The main reason is that he's no real story other than being an Australian. Moneymaker had the "name" that all the news services picked up on, and he got there by winning a $39 satellite online which was a first. Let's not also forget that because of the online entries that year, it set a record for the biggest WSOP ever, as well as the prize money was exhorbitant compared to prior years.

When Raymer took it last year it was also big news because of A. He won a satellite at the exact same site (Poker Stars) that Moneymaker did, a parlay that boggles the mind when you think about two poker players winning the whole enchilada back to back from the same site, and not known professionals.
B. He took down a $5 million dollar purse C. Wearing those glasses, and having the nickname "fossilman" and using a fossil for covering his cards, was more newsworthy fodder for the news outlets to pick up on! D, The big win by Moneymaker brought more attention to the WSOP.

Probably the biggest factor in the WSOP getting so much attention were the above two winning after qualifying in an offshore satellite. This gave every Joe Blow amateur a "hope and prayer" that they too could win the big one at some time in the future. Joe Blow isn't going to fly in from Kansas and lay out 10 grand to enter the tourney. Joe Hachem did that very thing, although I believe he had some "mates" taking a piece of him, so we probably won't know how much he really wound up with.

As far as tipping goes, like someone mentioned, money is witheld from the prize money to tip the dealers. If a winner choses to add more to the pot and be "george", that's up to him. Australians are not known to be good tippers, and it could be he felt he already met his obligation with the money witheld from the prize money. Let's not forget, because he wasn't an American, they withheld something like around 35% of the prize money according to IRS rules. If he had partners like I was led to believe, they probably put the "kabosh" on subtacting any more from the prize money that was already seriously depleted. Let's face it, with the IRS take of $2.625 million taken out, AND "only" a 7.5 million payout from an expected 10 million payout, would cause anyone to think twice about subtracting one more dime from the prize winnings! Especially since the dealers were already taken care of. They were already making 4-5 times the amount they usually make dealing per day, so it wasn't like they were starving!
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,615
Tokens
In addition to all that he has to play Australian income tax rates which are probably ridiculously high for the bracket he's in.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,781
Tokens
He may or may not have to pay income taxes. In Australia you don't pay taxes on gambling winnings unless its your profession. He got pissed at his wife, she might have cost him millions! She told the press he is a professional gambler, he told the world he just does it as a hobby. Obviously the tax authorities there will be focusing on what his wife said.

Imagine that, actually getting your wife to agree to letting you be a professional gambler and then having it potentially backfire on you.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,615
Tokens
That's why I'll never get married; having a wife is like laying -120 instead of -110. In the long run, it'll destroy you.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
407
Tokens
"That's why I'll never get married; having a wife is like laying -120 instead of -110. In the long run, it'll destroy you."

Couldn't have said it better myself Belch One!
 

New member
Joined
Dec 20, 2002
Messages
3,291
Tokens
This thread alone validates what Doyle thought of the first left field non-pro winner and his "wrist necklace" exhibition the following year, as it was actually Robert Varkonyi before CM and GR. But whom even remembers the guy already, sans a nice run by his wife Olga this past WSOP.

The first woman to ever win the WSOP Main Event will be a huge story. Duke, Lieber, Gowin, Ng, Harmon,etc..it's gonna be a monster. And it's gonna happen before one ever wins the White House.
 

New member
Joined
Feb 4, 2003
Messages
3,271
Tokens
Belch One said:
That's why I'll never get married; having a wife is like laying -120 instead of -110. In the long run, it'll destroy you.


In the poker game of life, women are the rake man. They are the fvckin' rake.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,590
Messages
13,452,687
Members
99,423
Latest member
lbplayer
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com