Tulsa said:For what it's worth, I initially liked the Mets and now I am going to 'no play' that one. But, my only reasoning is that already mentioned by Clip Joint in this thread and the line is low enough to (I know they don't exist) make me think trap line. Now whatever causes me to say 'trap' line, even though I have from a good source there is no such thing, seems to work for me and the dynamics always look like this one whatever you call it. Call it a tulsa line if you don't believe in trap lines. This line has the taint of something too good to be true and I am worried that it is a tulsa line. tulsa
RNIC5148 said:GOOD INPUT GUYS THANKS . BUT I JUST CAN'T PASS ON THIS ONE IT SOUNDS LIKE A LOCK IF THERE EVER WAS SUCH A THING ! I MIGHT LAY A LITTLE LESS SMACK ON THIS ONE BUT I HAVE TO PLAY IT .
RNIC5148 said:THESE ARE VALID POINTS CLIP,BUT I THINK THE METS ARE ON A LITTLE BIT OF A ROLL RIGHT NOW DRIVEING TOWARD THE PLAYOFFS AND COLORADO IS JUST PLAYING OUT THE GAMES ! I LIKE METS TONIGHT AND I LIKE THE UNDER 12.5 TONIGHT . CALL ME CRAZY
:howdy: :lolBIG:
Tulsa said:Clip Joint said:
>>>Public opinion on Colorado just being a bad team coupled with the Mets as a playoff contender makes the public believe the Mets should be a huge favorite.<<<
Maybe that is what makes the dynamics of the lines in question....what can be called a 'too good to be true' line (from the surface examination, not with in-depth analysis at all.) I agree wholeheartedly with you, and when I see this situation, I avoid it. I still believe you that there are no 'trap' plays set by linesmakers but for want of a better name....? A fool's line? Not that you guy's on the Mets are fool's I just wonder what we should call these situations when a line looks like a gift from above (I KNOW none of those exist.) tulsa